From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [regression] cross core scheduling frequency drop bisected to 0c313cb20732 Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:40:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1460184056.3765.160.camel@gmail.com> References: <1460092854.4051.1.camel@gmail.com> <20160408064510.GK3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1460098254.5582.17.camel@gmail.com> <2428384.mEkP3EOpsR@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:34960 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752351AbcDIGlB (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2016 02:41:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2428384.mEkP3EOpsR@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Linux PM list , Doug Smythies , Rik van Riel On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 22:59 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, April 08, 2016 08:50:54 AM Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 08:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > Cute, I thought you used governor=performance for your runs? > > > > I do, and those numbers are with it thus set. > > Well, this is a trade-off. > > 4.5 introduced a power regression here so this one goes back to the previous > state of things. That sounds somewhat reasonable. Too bad I don't have a super duper watt meter handy.. seeing that you really really are saving me money would perhaps make me less fond of those prettier numbers. -Mike