linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] intel_pstate: support scheduler cpufreq callbacks on remote CPUs
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:39:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461119969-10371-3-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461119969-10371-1-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org>

In preparation for the scheduler cpufreq callback happening on remote
CPUs, add support for this in intel_pstate, which requires the
callback run on the local CPU to be able to change the CPU frequency.

Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 6c7cff13f0ed..fa49d3944aa5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ struct _pid {
  * struct cpudata -	Per CPU instance data storage
  * @cpu:		CPU number for this instance data
  * @update_util:	CPUFreq utility callback information
+ * @irq_work:		Data for passing remote callbacks to the target CPU
+ * @time:		Timestamp of CPUFreq callback
+ * @ipi_in_progress:	Whether a remote callback IPI is outstanding
  * @pstate:		Stores P state limits for this CPU
  * @vid:		Stores VID limits for this CPU
  * @pid:		Stores PID parameters for this CPU
@@ -179,6 +182,9 @@ struct cpudata {
 	int cpu;
 
 	struct update_util_data update_util;
+	struct irq_work irq_work;
+	u64	time;
+	bool	ipi_in_progress;
 
 	struct pstate_data pstate;
 	struct vid_data vid;
@@ -1173,20 +1179,88 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
 		get_avg_frequency(cpu));
 }
 
+static void _intel_pstate_update_util(struct cpudata *cpu, u64 time)
+{
+	bool sample_taken = intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time);
+
+	if (sample_taken && !hwp_active)
+		intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static void intel_pstate_update_util_remote(struct irq_work *irq_work)
+{
+	struct cpudata *cpu = container_of(irq_work, struct cpudata, irq_work);
+	s64 delta_ns = cpu->time - cpu->sample.time;
+
+	/*
+	 * A local update may have happened while the ipi
+	 * was in progress so re-check the time.
+	 */
+	if (delta_ns < pid_params.sample_rate_ns)
+		return;
+
+	_intel_pstate_update_util(cpu, cpu->time);
+
+	cpu->ipi_in_progress = false;
+}
+
 static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
 				     unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
 {
 	struct cpudata *cpu = container_of(data, struct cpudata, update_util);
-	u64 delta_ns = time - cpu->sample.time;
+	s64 delta_ns = time - cpu->sample.time;
 
-	if ((s64)delta_ns >= pid_params.sample_rate_ns) {
-		bool sample_taken = intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time);
+	if (delta_ns < pid_params.sample_rate_ns)
+		return;
 
-		if (sample_taken && !hwp_active)
-			intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
+	if (cpu->cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
+		_intel_pstate_update_util(cpu, time);
+	} else {
+		/* The target CPU's rq lock is held. */
+		if (cpu->ipi_in_progress)
+			return;
+
+		/* Re-check sample_time which may have advanced. */
+		smp_rmb();
+		delta_ns = time - READ_ONCE(cpu->sample.time);
+		if (delta_ns < pid_params.sample_rate_ns)
+			return;
+
+		cpu->ipi_in_progress = true;
+		cpu->time = time;
+		irq_work_queue_on(&cpu->irq_work, cpu->cpu);
 	}
 }
 
+static inline void intel_pstate_irq_work_sync(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	irq_work_sync(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->irq_work);
+}
+
+static inline void intel_pstate_init_irq_work(struct cpudata *cpu)
+{
+	init_irq_work(&cpu->irq_work, intel_pstate_update_util_remote);
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
+static inline void intel_pstate_irq_work_sync(unsigned int cpu) {}
+static inline void intel_pstate_init_irq_work(struct cpudata *cpu) {}
+
+static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
+				     unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
+{
+	struct cpudata *cpu = container_of(data, struct cpudata, update_util);
+	s64 delta_ns = time - cpu->sample.time;
+
+	if (delta_ns < pid_params.sample_rate_ns)
+		return;
+
+	_intel_pstate_update_util(cpu, time);
+}
+#endif
+
+
+
 #define ICPU(model, policy) \
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF,\
 			(unsigned long)&policy }
@@ -1273,6 +1347,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook(cpu);
 	synchronize_sched();
+	intel_pstate_irq_work_sync(cpu);
 }
 
 static void intel_pstate_set_performance_limits(struct perf_limits *limits)
@@ -1379,6 +1454,9 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
 
+	intel_pstate_init_irq_work(cpu);
+
+
 	if (limits->min_perf_pct == 100 && limits->max_perf_pct == 100)
 		policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
 	else
-- 
2.4.10

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20  2:39 [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: governor: support scheduler cpufreq callbacks on remote CPUs Steve Muckle
2016-04-20  2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: schedutil: " Steve Muckle
2016-04-20  2:39 ` Steve Muckle [this message]
2016-04-20 12:37   ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] intel_pstate: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-21  2:20     ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-25 21:34       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-20  2:39 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: call cpufreq hook for remote wakeups Steve Muckle
2016-04-20 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: governor: support scheduler cpufreq callbacks on remote CPUs Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-25 19:17   ` Steve Muckle
2016-04-25 21:28     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-04-29 10:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-04-29 11:21   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-06 20:53     ` Steve Muckle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461119969-10371-3-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org \
    --to=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
    --cc=Juri.Lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).