From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srinivas Pandruvada Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Downgrade print level for _PPC Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 23:31:23 -0700 Message-ID: <1464589883-29350-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:58140 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753773AbcE3Gc0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 02:32:26 -0400 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Srinivas Pandruvada Downgrade pr_info to pr_debug for message "_PPC limits will be enforced " In server systems with many cores this message is annoying. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index 3a9c432..0d159b5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) cpu->acpi_perf_data.states[0].core_frequency = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 1000; cpu->valid_pss_table = true; - pr_info("_PPC limits will be enforced\n"); + pr_debug("_PPC limits will be enforced\n"); return; -- 2.5.0