From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:14:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1466082894.20208.1.camel@linaro.org> References: <1466073481-697-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1466073481-697-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 11:37 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > This series add support for SCPI based device device power state > management using genpd. > > Regards, > Sudeep > > v1[1]->v2: > - Fixed the endianness handling in scpi_device_get_power_state > as spotted by Tixy > - Renamed scpi_pd.c to scpi_pm_domain.c as suggested by Ulf You seemed to also have made some changes to the contents of the file, is that deliberate? This is the diff... --- a/drivers/firmware/scpi_pm_domain.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/scpi_pd.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct scpi_pm_domain { struct generic_pm_domain genpd; struct scpi_ops *ops; u32 domain; - char name[20]; + char name[30]; }; enum scpi_power_domain_state { @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int scpi_pd_power(struct scpi_pm_domain *pd, bool power_on) if (ret) return ret; - return (state == pd->ops->device_get_power_state(pd->domain)); + return !(state == pd->ops->device_get_power_state(pd->domain)); } static int scpi_pd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)