From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/25] serial: sh-sci: Convert from clk_get() to devm_clk_get()
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:39:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466956.fL4LZVx6Ru@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXn4xa-0wfL8DXbhzfsPwymT5XXBR70eSL-OF5Fv67+mg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Thursday 10 December 2015 13:30:18 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 November 2015 19:38:46 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Transfer clock cleanup handling to the core device management code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 8 +++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> >> index cba51da604253db6..9442961a198378c7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> >> @@ -2216,7 +2216,7 @@ static struct uart_ops sci_uart_ops = {
> >>
> >> static int sci_init_clocks(struct sci_port *sci_port, struct device
> >> *dev)
> >> {
> >>
> >> /* Get the SCI functional clock. It's called "fck" on ARM. */
> >>
> >> - sci_port->fclk = clk_get(dev, "fck");
> >> + sci_port->fclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "fck");
> >
> > Have you tested what happens if you unbind the device from the driver
> > while userspace has the serial port open ?
>
> Yes I have. And I didn't notice any user-visible behavioral differences.
>
> There is a small ordering difference, though: with clk_get() and clk_put(),
> the explicit clk_put() is done before removing the device from its PM
> Domain (which involces another call to clk_put() on the module clock):
>
> device_release_driver
> __device_release_driver
> platform_drv_remove
> sci_remove
> sci_cleanup_single
> __clk_put
> genpd_dev_pm_detach
> pm_genpd_remove_device
> pm_clk_destroy
> __pm_clk_remove
> __clk_put
>
> When using devm_clk_get(), the managed cleanup is done after the device has
> been removed from its PM Domain:
>
> device_release_driver
> __device_release_driver
> platform_drv_remove
> genpd_dev_pm_detach
> pm_genpd_remove_device
> pm_clk_destroy
> __pm_clk_remove
> __clk_put
> release_nodes
> __clk_put
>
> This shouldn't make a difference, and applies to all other drivers using
> devm_*(), and devices that are part of a PM Domain.
I was more concerned about the clk_disable_unprepare() calls. The function is
called through the uart pm handler which is called when closing the uart
(uart_close()). It's a bit difficult to follow the dynamic code paths as I'm
not very familiar with the framework, but I was concerned that the would end
up calling clk_disable_unprepare() on a clock for which we have no reference
anymore. What prevents clk_disable_unprepare() from being called in the close
path after the device has been unbound ? And what ensures that the clocks get
unprepared when unbinding the device if the port is held open by a userspace
process ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-13 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1447958344-836-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
[not found] ` <1447958344-836-8-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
[not found] ` <3399561.8ERHTtILhO@avalon>
2015-12-10 12:30 ` [PATCH 07/25] serial: sh-sci: Convert from clk_get() to devm_clk_get() Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-12-13 19:39 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-12-14 10:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-12-14 15:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466956.fL4LZVx6Ru@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox