From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org, pprakash@codeaurora.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] acpi: cppc: Allow build with ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS config
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 05:34:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471005283.22284.7.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160812091337.GA7017@arm.com>
On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 10:13 +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> >
> (adding Sudeep and Prashanth in c/c)
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 05:17:22PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
[...]
> > result = acpi_cppc_processor_probe(pr);
> > - if (result)
> > + if (result) {
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS
> > return -ENODEV;
> > +#endif
> > + }
> >
> > if (!cpuidle_get_driver() || cpuidle_get_driver() ==
> > &acpi_idle_driver)
> > acpi_processor_power_init(pr);
> If PSS is not defined and kernel fails to probe CPPC then why we
> should not
> execute acpi_processor_power_init()?
Did I change the current behavior? Currently when
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() fails, then -ENODEV is returned.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Best regards,
> Alexey
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-12 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-11 0:17 [PATCH 0/5] x86 CPPC usage Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-11 0:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] acpi: cppc: Allow build with ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS config Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-12 9:13 ` Alexey Klimov
2016-08-12 12:34 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2016-08-12 16:04 ` Prakash, Prashanth
2016-08-12 16:32 ` Hoan Tran
2016-08-12 16:53 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-12 16:35 ` Hoan Tran
2016-08-12 16:52 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-12 16:58 ` Hoan Tran
2016-08-12 17:16 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-11 0:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] acpi: cpcc: Add integer read support Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-11 0:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] acpi: cppc: Add support for function fixed hardware address Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-11 0:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi: cppc: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure name Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-11 0:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] acpi: bus: Enable HWP CPPC objects Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-16 14:32 ` Alexey Klimov
2016-08-16 16:50 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-08-18 21:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86 CPPC usage Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471005283.22284.7.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.klimov@arm.com \
--cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pprakash@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).