From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srinivas Pandruvada Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:49:30 -0700 Message-ID: <1473364170.154359.68.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <2730042.XLMy9dAKI1@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160908002226.GC15431@graphite.smuckle.net> <1473294950.154359.38.camel@linux.intel.com> <20160908192615.GD15431@graphite.smuckle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:41231 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750992AbcIHTtb (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:49:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160908192615.GD15431@graphite.smuckle.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Muckle Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Viresh Kumar , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Doug Smythies On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 12:26 -0700, Steve Muckle wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 05:35:50PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > > Did you see any performance regression on Android workloads? > > I did a few AnTuTU runs and did not observe a regression. Thanks. -Srinivas > thanks, > Steve