* [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed
@ 2016-11-16 2:36 Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-17 0:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-11-17 2:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2016-11-16 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux PM list
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Srinivas Pandruvada
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, intel_pstate is unable to control P-states on my
IvyBridge-based Acer Aspire S5, because they are controlled by SMM
on that machine by default and it is necessary to request OS control
of P-states from it via the SMI Command register exposed in the ACPI
FADT. intel_pstate doesn't do that now, but acpi-cpufreq and other
cpufreq drivers for x86 platforms do.
Address this problem by making intel_pstate use the ACPI-defined
mechanism as well. However, intel_pstate is not modular and it
doesn't need the module refcount tricks played by
acpi_processor_notify_smm(), so export the core of this function
to it as acpi_processor_pstate_control() and make it call that.
[The changes in processor_perflib.c related to this should not
make any functional difference for the acpi_processor_notify_smm()
users].
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 8 ++++++
include/acpi/processor.h | 1
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -465,11 +465,33 @@ int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(
return result;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_get_performance_info);
-int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
+
+int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void)
{
acpi_status status;
- static int is_done = 0;
+ if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command || !acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control)
+ return 0;
+
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "Writing pstate_control [0x%x] to smi_command [0x%x]\n",
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
+
+ status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
+ (u32)acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, 8);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+ return 1;
+
+ ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
+ "Failed to write pstate_control [0x%x] to smi_command [0x%x]",
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
+int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
+{
+ static int is_done = 0;
+ int result;
if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
return -EBUSY;
@@ -492,26 +514,15 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct mod
is_done = -EIO;
- /* Can't write pstate_control to smi_command if either value is zero */
- if ((!acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command) || (!acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control)) {
+ result = acpi_processor_pstate_control();
+ if (!result) {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "No SMI port or pstate_control\n"));
module_put(calling_module);
return 0;
}
-
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Writing pstate_control [0x%x] to smi_command [0x%x]\n",
- acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
-
- status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
- (u32) acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, 8);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
- "Failed to write pstate_control [0x%x] to "
- "smi_command [0x%x]", acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control,
- acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
+ if (result < 0) {
module_put(calling_module);
- return status;
+ return result;
}
/* Success. If there's no _PPC, we need to fear nothing, so
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ extern int acpi_processor_register_perfo
*performance, unsigned int cpu);
extern void acpi_processor_unregister_performance(unsigned int cpu);
+int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void);
/* note: this locks both the calling module and the processor module
if a _PPC object exists, rmmod is disallowed then */
int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2034,9 +2034,15 @@ static bool __init intel_pstate_platform
return false;
}
+
+static void intel_pstate_request_control(void)
+{
+ acpi_processor_pstate_control();
+}
#else /* CONFIG_ACPI not enabled */
static inline bool intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(void) { return false; }
static inline bool intel_pstate_has_acpi_ppc(void) { return false; }
+static inline void intel_pstate_request_control(void) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
static const struct x86_cpu_id hwp_support_ids[] __initconst = {
@@ -2088,6 +2094,8 @@ hwp_cpu_matched:
if (!hwp_active && hwp_only)
goto out;
+ intel_pstate_request_control();
+
rc = cpufreq_register_driver(intel_pstate_driver);
if (rc)
goto out;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed
2016-11-16 2:36 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2016-11-17 0:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-11-17 2:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Srinivas Pandruvada @ 2016-11-17 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM list
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 03:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Currently, intel_pstate is unable to control P-states on my
> IvyBridge-based Acer Aspire S5, because they are controlled by SMM
> on that machine by default and it is necessary to request OS control
> of P-states from it via the SMI Command register exposed in the ACPI
> FADT. intel_pstate doesn't do that now, but acpi-cpufreq and other
> cpufreq drivers for x86 platforms do.
>
> Address this problem by making intel_pstate use the ACPI-defined
> mechanism as well. However, intel_pstate is not modular and it
> doesn't need the module refcount tricks played by
> acpi_processor_notify_smm(), so export the core of this function
> to it as acpi_processor_pstate_control() and make it call that.
> [The changes in processor_perflib.c related to this should not
> make any functional difference for the acpi_processor_notify_smm()
> users].
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> -------------
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 8 ++++++
> include/acpi/processor.h | 1
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> @@ -465,11 +465,33 @@ int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(
> return result;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_get_performance_info);
> -int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
> +
> +int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void)
> {
> acpi_status status;
> - static int is_done = 0;
>
> + if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command ||
> !acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> + "Writing pstate_control [0x%x] to
> smi_command [0x%x]\n",
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control,
> acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
> +
> + status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
> + (u32)acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_contro
> l, 8);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + return 1;
> +
> + ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
> + "Failed to write pstate_control [0x%x] to
> smi_command [0x%x]",
> + acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control,
> acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
> + return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
> +{
> + static int is_done = 0;
> + int result;
>
> if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
> return -EBUSY;
> @@ -492,26 +514,15 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct mod
>
> is_done = -EIO;
>
> - /* Can't write pstate_control to smi_command if either value
> is zero */
> - if ((!acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command) ||
> (!acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control)) {
> + result = acpi_processor_pstate_control();
> + if (!result) {
> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "No SMI port or
> pstate_control\n"));
> module_put(calling_module);
> return 0;
> }
> -
> - ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> - "Writing pstate_control [0x%x] to
> smi_command [0x%x]\n",
> - acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control,
> acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
> -
> - status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
> - (u32)
> acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, 8);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
> - "Failed to write pstate_control
> [0x%x] to "
> - "smi_command [0x%x]",
> acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control,
> - acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
> + if (result < 0) {
> module_put(calling_module);
> - return status;
> + return result;
> }
>
> /* Success. If there's no _PPC, we need to fear nothing, so
> Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ extern int acpi_processor_register_perfo
> *performance,
> unsigned int cpu);
> extern void acpi_processor_unregister_performance(unsigned int cpu);
>
> +int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void);
> /* note: this locks both the calling module and the processor module
> if a _PPC object exists, rmmod is disallowed then */
> int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module);
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -2034,9 +2034,15 @@ static bool __init intel_pstate_platform
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +static void intel_pstate_request_control(void)
> +{
> + acpi_processor_pstate_control();
> +}
> #else /* CONFIG_ACPI not enabled */
> static inline bool intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(void) {
> return false; }
> static inline bool intel_pstate_has_acpi_ppc(void) { return false; }
> +static inline void intel_pstate_request_control(void) {}
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> static const struct x86_cpu_id hwp_support_ids[] __initconst = {
> @@ -2088,6 +2094,8 @@ hwp_cpu_matched:
> if (!hwp_active && hwp_only)
> goto out;
>
> + intel_pstate_request_control();
> +
> rc = cpufreq_register_driver(intel_pstate_driver);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed
2016-11-16 2:36 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-17 0:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
@ 2016-11-17 2:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2016-11-17 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux PM list
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Srinivas Pandruvada
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, intel_pstate is unable to control P-states on my
IvyBridge-based Acer Aspire S5, because they are controlled by SMM
on that machine by default and it is necessary to request OS control
of P-states from it via the SMI Command register exposed in the ACPI
FADT. intel_pstate doesn't do that now, but acpi-cpufreq and other
cpufreq drivers for x86 platforms do.
Address this problem by making intel_pstate use the ACPI-defined
mechanism as well. However, intel_pstate is not modular and it
doesn't need the module refcount tricks played by
acpi_processor_notify_smm(), so export the core of this function
to it as acpi_processor_pstate_control() and make it call that.
[The changes in processor_perflib.c related to this should not
make any functional difference for the acpi_processor_notify_smm()
users].
To be safe, only call acpi_processor_pstate_control() from intel_pstate
if ACPI _PPC support is enabled in it.
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
-> v2:
Avoid calling acpi_processor_pstate_control() from intel_pstate if it is not
configured to support ACPI _PPC.
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 13 +++++++++++
include/acpi/processor.h | 1
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -465,11 +465,33 @@ int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(
return result;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_get_performance_info);
-int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
+
+int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void)
{
acpi_status status;
- static int is_done = 0;
+ if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command || !acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control)
+ return 0;
+
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "Writing pstate_control [0x%x] to smi_command [0x%x]\n",
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
+
+ status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
+ (u32)acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, 8);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+ return 1;
+
+ ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
+ "Failed to write pstate_control [0x%x] to smi_command [0x%x]",
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
+int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
+{
+ static int is_done = 0;
+ int result;
if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
return -EBUSY;
@@ -492,26 +514,15 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct mod
is_done = -EIO;
- /* Can't write pstate_control to smi_command if either value is zero */
- if ((!acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command) || (!acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control)) {
+ result = acpi_processor_pstate_control();
+ if (!result) {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "No SMI port or pstate_control\n"));
module_put(calling_module);
return 0;
}
-
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Writing pstate_control [0x%x] to smi_command [0x%x]\n",
- acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
-
- status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
- (u32) acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control, 8);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
- "Failed to write pstate_control [0x%x] to "
- "smi_command [0x%x]", acpi_gbl_FADT.pstate_control,
- acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command));
+ if (result < 0) {
module_put(calling_module);
- return status;
+ return result;
}
/* Success. If there's no _PPC, we need to fear nothing, so
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ extern int acpi_processor_register_perfo
*performance, unsigned int cpu);
extern void acpi_processor_unregister_performance(unsigned int cpu);
+int acpi_processor_pstate_control(void);
/* note: this locks both the calling module and the processor module
if a _PPC object exists, rmmod is disallowed then */
int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2034,9 +2034,20 @@ static bool __init intel_pstate_platform
return false;
}
+
+static void intel_pstate_request_control_from_smm(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * It may be unsafe to request P-states control from SMM if _PPC support
+ * has not been enabled.
+ */
+ if (acpi_ppc)
+ acpi_processor_pstate_control();
+}
#else /* CONFIG_ACPI not enabled */
static inline bool intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(void) { return false; }
static inline bool intel_pstate_has_acpi_ppc(void) { return false; }
+static inline void intel_pstate_request_control_from_smm(void) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
static const struct x86_cpu_id hwp_support_ids[] __initconst = {
@@ -2088,6 +2099,8 @@ hwp_cpu_matched:
if (!hwp_active && hwp_only)
goto out;
+ intel_pstate_request_control_from_smm();
+
rc = cpufreq_register_driver(intel_pstate_driver);
if (rc)
goto out;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-17 2:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-16 2:36 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Request P-states control from SMM if needed Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-11-17 0:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-11-17 2:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).