From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srinivas Pandruvada Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Support of energy performance hint using HWP Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:31:32 -0800 Message-ID: <1479411092.6544.129.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1479250783-74336-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <1479250783-74336-2-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20161117064954.GD4894@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:55923 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751161AbcKQTbd (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:31:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161117064954.GD4894@vireshk-i7> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, Juri.Lelli@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Viresh, On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 12:19 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Srinivas, > > I don't think other platforms need it for now and so it is fine to > add these to the driver itself. Good to know. In this case I will proceed with change only local to intel_pstate. > > On 15-11-16, 14:59, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > > +static ssize_t show_energy_performance_available_preferences( > > Maybe a personal preference, but I would have broken the line after > ssize_t instead of where you have done it. I can change that. > > > > > + struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > > char *buf) > > +{ > > +static struct freq_attr *hwp_cpufreq_attrs[] = { > > + &energy_performance_preference, > > + &energy_performance_available_preferences, > > + NULL, > > +}; > > What about adding these to intel_pstate_attr_group instead ? Sure. Thanks, Srinivas