From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Remove confusing error message in of_cpumask_init_opp_table() Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:59:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1480730.ra5d89GYrs@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1444837943-32263-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <2736370.6HB7CanQEp@vostro.rjw.lan> <20151014232927.4b43a897@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:50049 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753612AbbJNVbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:31:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151014232927.4b43a897@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Viresh Kumar , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai , Lior Amsalem , Gregory Clement On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:29:27 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:44:03 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:10:39 PM Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Rafael, > > > > > > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:28:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > To avoid this confusion, this patch simply deletes the error message. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > > > > > > > > That's only present in linux-next now, right? > > > > > > No, it is already in 4.3-rc since 4.3-rc1. The commit adding the > > > problematic function is 8d4d4e98acd68c31435ebb7beea591dbf60b9eb2, and > > > this function gets used in cpufreq-dt starting at commit > > > 2e02d8723edf6599988852a8ade8f83b2f766cb8. > > > > > > $ git tag --contains 2e02d8723edf6599988852a8ade8f83b2f766cb8 > > > v4.3-rc1 > > > v4.3-rc2 > > > v4.3-rc3 > > > v4.3-rc4 > > > v4.3-rc5 > > > > OK, thanks! > > > > It should carry a > > > > Fixes: 2e02d8723edf > > > > tag then, right? > > Yes, I wasn't sure if it really is a fix, and if so, which commit it is > fixing. It is really 8d4d4e98acd68c31435ebb7beea591dbf60b9eb2 that > introduces the confusing message, but the message will not appear until > the newly added function gets used in > 2e02d8723edf6599988852a8ade8f83b2f766cb8. > > But if 2e02d8723edf6599988852a8ade8f83b2f766cb8 is considered to be the > commit actually introducing the regression, then I'll resubmit an > updated version with the Fixes: tag. I've added the tag and applied the patch already. Thanks, Rafael