* [RESEND PATCH 0/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks
@ 2017-01-12 17:17 Ulf Hansson
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename functions in genpd for power on/off Ulf Hansson
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks Ulf Hansson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2017-01-12 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Ulf Hansson, linux-pm
Cc: Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Kevin Hilman, Geert Uytterhoeven,
Lina Iyer, Jon Hunter, Marek Szyprowski, Brian Norris
This problem was brought up by Brian Norris [1], and I decided to help out
fixing the issue in genpd.
While working on it, I realized that the execution path when powering on/off a
PM domain in genpd, wasn't self-explanatory, so I folded in a change which
improved the code around that a bit.
I did not target stable or fixes for this, but perhaps we should!?
[1]
https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=147990652405772&w=2
Ulf Hansson (2):
PM / Domains: Rename functions in genpd for power on/off
PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks
drivers/base/power/domain.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RESEND PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename functions in genpd for power on/off
2017-01-12 17:17 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks Ulf Hansson
@ 2017-01-12 17:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-13 19:53 ` Kevin Hilman
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks Ulf Hansson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2017-01-12 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Ulf Hansson, linux-pm
Cc: Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Kevin Hilman, Geert Uytterhoeven,
Lina Iyer, Jon Hunter, Marek Szyprowski, Brian Norris
Currently the mix of genpd_poweron(), genpd_power_on(),
genpd_sync_poweron() and the ->power_on() callback, makes a bit difficult
to follow the path of execution. The similar applies to the functions
dealing with power off.
In a way to improve this understanding, let's do the following renaming:
genpd_power_on() -> _genpd_power_on()
genpd_poweron() -> genpd_power_on()
genpd_sync_poweron() -> genpd_sync_power_on()
genpd_power_off() -> _genpd_power_off()
genpd_poweroff() -> genpd_power_off()
genpd_sync_poweroff() -> genpd_sync_power_off()
genpd_poweroff_unused() -> genpd_power_off_unused()
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/domain.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index 2997026..fd2e3e1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static void genpd_sd_counter_inc(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
smp_mb__after_atomic();
}
-static int genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed)
+static int _genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed)
{
unsigned int state_idx = genpd->state_idx;
ktime_t time_start;
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed)
return ret;
}
-static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed)
+static int _genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed)
{
unsigned int state_idx = genpd->state_idx;
ktime_t time_start;
@@ -262,10 +262,10 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed)
}
/**
- * genpd_queue_power_off_work - Queue up the execution of genpd_poweroff().
+ * genpd_queue_power_off_work - Queue up the execution of genpd_power_off().
* @genpd: PM domain to power off.
*
- * Queue up the execution of genpd_poweroff() unless it's already been done
+ * Queue up the execution of genpd_power_off() unless it's already been done
* before.
*/
static void genpd_queue_power_off_work(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
@@ -274,14 +274,14 @@ static void genpd_queue_power_off_work(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
}
/**
- * genpd_poweron - Restore power to a given PM domain and its masters.
+ * genpd_power_on - Restore power to a given PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power up.
* @depth: nesting count for lockdep.
*
* Restore power to @genpd and all of its masters so that it is possible to
* resume a device belonging to it.
*/
-static int genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, unsigned int depth)
+static int genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, unsigned int depth)
{
struct gpd_link *link;
int ret = 0;
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, unsigned int depth)
genpd_sd_counter_inc(master);
genpd_lock_nested(master, depth + 1);
- ret = genpd_poweron(master, depth + 1);
+ ret = genpd_power_on(master, depth + 1);
genpd_unlock(master);
if (ret) {
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, unsigned int depth)
}
}
- ret = genpd_power_on(genpd, true);
+ ret = _genpd_power_on(genpd, true);
if (ret)
goto err;
@@ -368,14 +368,14 @@ static int genpd_dev_pm_qos_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
}
/**
- * genpd_poweroff - Remove power from a given PM domain.
+ * genpd_power_off - Remove power from a given PM domain.
* @genpd: PM domain to power down.
* @is_async: PM domain is powered down from a scheduled work
*
* If all of the @genpd's devices have been suspended and all of its subdomains
* have been powered down, remove power from @genpd.
*/
-static int genpd_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool is_async)
+static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool is_async)
{
struct pm_domain_data *pdd;
struct gpd_link *link;
@@ -427,13 +427,13 @@ static int genpd_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool is_async)
/*
* If sd_count > 0 at this point, one of the subdomains hasn't
- * managed to call genpd_poweron() for the master yet after
- * incrementing it. In that case genpd_poweron() will wait
+ * managed to call genpd_power_on() for the master yet after
+ * incrementing it. In that case genpd_power_on() will wait
* for us to drop the lock, so we can call .power_off() and let
- * the genpd_poweron() restore power for us (this shouldn't
+ * the genpd_power_on() restore power for us (this shouldn't
* happen very often).
*/
- ret = genpd_power_off(genpd, true);
+ ret = _genpd_power_off(genpd, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static void genpd_power_off_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
genpd = container_of(work, struct generic_pm_domain, power_off_work);
genpd_lock(genpd);
- genpd_poweroff(genpd, true);
+ genpd_power_off(genpd, true);
genpd_unlock(genpd);
}
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int genpd_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
return 0;
genpd_lock(genpd);
- genpd_poweroff(genpd, false);
+ genpd_power_off(genpd, false);
genpd_unlock(genpd);
return 0;
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
}
genpd_lock(genpd);
- ret = genpd_poweron(genpd, 0);
+ ret = genpd_power_on(genpd, 0);
genpd_unlock(genpd);
if (ret)
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static int genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
if (!pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(dev) ||
(pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(dev) && genpd_is_irq_safe(genpd))) {
genpd_lock(genpd);
- genpd_poweroff(genpd, 0);
+ genpd_power_off(genpd, 0);
genpd_unlock(genpd);
}
@@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ static int __init pd_ignore_unused_setup(char *__unused)
__setup("pd_ignore_unused", pd_ignore_unused_setup);
/**
- * genpd_poweroff_unused - Power off all PM domains with no devices in use.
+ * genpd_power_off_unused - Power off all PM domains with no devices in use.
*/
-static int __init genpd_poweroff_unused(void)
+static int __init genpd_power_off_unused(void)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static int __init genpd_poweroff_unused(void)
return 0;
}
-late_initcall(genpd_poweroff_unused);
+late_initcall(genpd_power_off_unused);
#if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) || defined(CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF)
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static bool genpd_dev_active_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
}
/**
- * genpd_sync_poweroff - Synchronously power off a PM domain and its masters.
+ * genpd_sync_power_off - Synchronously power off a PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power off, if possible.
*
* Check if the given PM domain can be powered off (during system suspend or
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ static bool genpd_dev_active_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
* executed sequentially, so it is guaranteed that it will never run twice in
* parallel).
*/
-static void genpd_sync_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
+static void genpd_sync_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
struct gpd_link *link;
@@ -751,18 +751,18 @@ static void genpd_sync_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
/* Choose the deepest state when suspending */
genpd->state_idx = genpd->state_count - 1;
- genpd_power_off(genpd, false);
+ _genpd_power_off(genpd, false);
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
- genpd_sync_poweroff(link->master);
+ genpd_sync_power_off(link->master);
}
}
/**
- * genpd_sync_poweron - Synchronously power on a PM domain and its masters.
+ * genpd_sync_power_on - Synchronously power on a PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power on.
*
* This function is only called in "noirq" and "syscore" stages of system power
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static void genpd_sync_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
* executed sequentially, so it is guaranteed that it will never run twice in
* parallel).
*/
-static void genpd_sync_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
+static void genpd_sync_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
{
struct gpd_link *link;
@@ -778,11 +778,11 @@ static void genpd_sync_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
return;
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
- genpd_sync_poweron(link->master);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(link->master);
genpd_sd_counter_inc(link->master);
}
- genpd_power_on(genpd, false);
+ _genpd_power_on(genpd, false);
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_ACTIVE;
}
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
* the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
*/
genpd->suspended_count++;
- genpd_sync_poweroff(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_off(genpd);
return 0;
}
@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
* guaranteed that this function will never run twice in parallel for
* the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
*/
- genpd_sync_poweron(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
genpd->suspended_count--;
if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
@@ -1012,12 +1012,12 @@ static int pm_genpd_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
if (genpd->suspended_count++ == 0)
/*
* The boot kernel might put the domain into arbitrary state,
- * so make it appear as powered off to genpd_sync_poweron(),
+ * so make it appear as powered off to genpd_sync_power_on(),
* so that it tries to power it on in case it was really off.
*/
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
- genpd_sync_poweron(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
@@ -1072,9 +1072,9 @@ static void genpd_syscore_switch(struct device *dev, bool suspend)
if (suspend) {
genpd->suspended_count++;
- genpd_sync_poweroff(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_off(genpd);
} else {
- genpd_sync_poweron(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
genpd->suspended_count--;
}
}
@@ -2043,7 +2043,7 @@ int genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev)
dev->pm_domain->sync = genpd_dev_pm_sync;
genpd_lock(pd);
- ret = genpd_poweron(pd, 0);
+ ret = genpd_power_on(pd, 0);
genpd_unlock(pd);
out:
return ret ? -EPROBE_DEFER : 0;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RESEND PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks
2017-01-12 17:17 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks Ulf Hansson
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename functions in genpd for power on/off Ulf Hansson
@ 2017-01-12 17:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-07 13:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2017-01-12 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Ulf Hansson, linux-pm
Cc: Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Kevin Hilman, Geert Uytterhoeven,
Lina Iyer, Jon Hunter, Marek Szyprowski, Brian Norris
As the PM core may invoke the *noirq() callbacks asynchronously, the
current lock-less approach in genpd doesn't work. The consequence is that
we may find concurrent operations racing to power on/off the PM domain.
As of now, no immediate errors has been reported, but it's probably only a
matter time. Therefor let's fix the problem now before this becomes a real
issue, by deploying the locking scheme to the relevant functions.
Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/domain.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index fd2e3e1..6b23d82 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -729,16 +729,17 @@ static bool genpd_dev_active_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
/**
* genpd_sync_power_off - Synchronously power off a PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power off, if possible.
+ * @depth: nesting count for lockdep.
*
* Check if the given PM domain can be powered off (during system suspend or
* hibernation) and do that if so. Also, in that case propagate to its masters.
*
* This function is only called in "noirq" and "syscore" stages of system power
- * transitions, so it need not acquire locks (all of the "noirq" callbacks are
- * executed sequentially, so it is guaranteed that it will never run twice in
- * parallel).
+ * transitions, but since the "noirq" callbacks may be executed asynchronously,
+ * the lock must be held.
*/
-static void genpd_sync_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
+static void genpd_sync_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
+ unsigned int depth)
{
struct gpd_link *link;
@@ -757,20 +758,24 @@ static void genpd_sync_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
- genpd_sync_power_off(link->master);
+
+ genpd_lock_nested(link->master, depth + 1);
+ genpd_sync_power_off(link->master, depth + 1);
+ genpd_unlock(link->master);
}
}
/**
* genpd_sync_power_on - Synchronously power on a PM domain and its masters.
* @genpd: PM domain to power on.
+ * @depth: nesting count for lockdep.
*
* This function is only called in "noirq" and "syscore" stages of system power
- * transitions, so it need not acquire locks (all of the "noirq" callbacks are
- * executed sequentially, so it is guaranteed that it will never run twice in
- * parallel).
+ * transitions, but since the "noirq" callbacks may be executed asynchronously,
+ * the lock must be held.
*/
-static void genpd_sync_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
+static void genpd_sync_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
+ unsigned int depth)
{
struct gpd_link *link;
@@ -778,8 +783,11 @@ static void genpd_sync_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
return;
list_for_each_entry(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node) {
- genpd_sync_power_on(link->master);
genpd_sd_counter_inc(link->master);
+
+ genpd_lock_nested(link->master, depth + 1);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(link->master, depth + 1);
+ genpd_unlock(link->master);
}
_genpd_power_on(genpd, false);
@@ -888,13 +896,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
return ret;
}
- /*
- * Since all of the "noirq" callbacks are executed sequentially, it is
- * guaranteed that this function will never run twice in parallel for
- * the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
- */
+ genpd_lock(genpd);
genpd->suspended_count++;
- genpd_sync_power_off(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, 0);
+ genpd_unlock(genpd);
return 0;
}
@@ -919,13 +924,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
return 0;
- /*
- * Since all of the "noirq" callbacks are executed sequentially, it is
- * guaranteed that this function will never run twice in parallel for
- * the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
- */
- genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
+ genpd_lock(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, 0);
genpd->suspended_count--;
+ genpd_unlock(genpd);
if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
@@ -1002,13 +1004,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
return -EINVAL;
/*
- * Since all of the "noirq" callbacks are executed sequentially, it is
- * guaranteed that this function will never run twice in parallel for
- * the same PM domain, so it is not necessary to use locking here.
- *
* At this point suspended_count == 0 means we are being run for the
* first time for the given domain in the present cycle.
*/
+ genpd_lock(genpd);
if (genpd->suspended_count++ == 0)
/*
* The boot kernel might put the domain into arbitrary state,
@@ -1017,7 +1016,8 @@ static int pm_genpd_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
*/
genpd->status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF;
- genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, 0);
+ genpd_unlock(genpd);
if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
@@ -1070,13 +1070,17 @@ static void genpd_syscore_switch(struct device *dev, bool suspend)
if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd))
return;
+ genpd_lock(genpd);
+
if (suspend) {
genpd->suspended_count++;
- genpd_sync_power_off(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, 0);
} else {
- genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
+ genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, 0);
genpd->suspended_count--;
}
+
+ genpd_unlock(genpd);
}
void pm_genpd_syscore_poweroff(struct device *dev)
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename functions in genpd for power on/off
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename functions in genpd for power on/off Ulf Hansson
@ 2017-01-13 19:53 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2017-01-13 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulf Hansson
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, Len Brown, Pavel Machek,
Geert Uytterhoeven, Lina Iyer, Jon Hunter, Marek Szyprowski,
Brian Norris
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> writes:
> Currently the mix of genpd_poweron(), genpd_power_on(),
> genpd_sync_poweron() and the ->power_on() callback, makes a bit difficult
> to follow the path of execution. The similar applies to the functions
> dealing with power off.
>
> In a way to improve this understanding, let's do the following renaming:
>
> genpd_power_on() -> _genpd_power_on()
> genpd_poweron() -> genpd_power_on()
> genpd_sync_poweron() -> genpd_sync_power_on()
>
> genpd_power_off() -> _genpd_power_off()
> genpd_poweroff() -> genpd_power_off()
> genpd_sync_poweroff() -> genpd_sync_power_off()
> genpd_poweroff_unused() -> genpd_power_off_unused()
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks Ulf Hansson
@ 2017-02-07 13:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-07 15:07 ` Ulf Hansson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-02-07 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulf Hansson, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux PM list, Len Brown, Pavel Machek, Kevin Hilman, Lina Iyer,
Jon Hunter, Marek Szyprowski, Brian Norris, Linux-Renesas
Hi Ulf, Rafael,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> As the PM core may invoke the *noirq() callbacks asynchronously, the
> current lock-less approach in genpd doesn't work. The consequence is that
> we may find concurrent operations racing to power on/off the PM domain.
>
> As of now, no immediate errors has been reported, but it's probably only a
> matter time. Therefor let's fix the problem now before this becomes a real
> issue, by deploying the locking scheme to the relevant functions.
>
> Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This is commit ef4f7e2c8335a56b in pm/linux-next.
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index fd2e3e1..6b23d82 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -729,16 +729,17 @@ static bool genpd_dev_active_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> @@ -1070,13 +1070,17 @@ static void genpd_syscore_switch(struct device *dev, bool suspend)
> if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd))
> return;
>
> + genpd_lock(genpd);
> +
> if (suspend) {
> genpd->suspended_count++;
> - genpd_sync_power_off(genpd);
> + genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, 0);
> } else {
> - genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
> + genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, 0);
> genpd->suspended_count--;
> }
> +
> + genpd_unlock(genpd);
> }
This causes the following BUG on all my Renesas arm32 boards, where the
system timer is an IRQ safe device:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:232
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 1751, name: s2ram
CPU: 0 PID: 1751 Comm: s2ram Not tainted
4.10.0-rc7-koelsch-05643-g27f4c73972a614fe #3354
Hardware name: Generic R8A7791 (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c020e9c4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020a40c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c020a40c>] (show_stack) from [<c03f9818>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
[<c03f9818>] (dump_stack) from [<c0240020>] (___might_sleep+0x124/0x160)
[<c0240020>] (___might_sleep) from [<c06fedfc>] (mutex_lock+0x18/0x60)
[<c06fedfc>] (mutex_lock) from [<c04de340>] (genpd_syscore_switch+0x2c/0x7c)
[<c04de340>] (genpd_syscore_switch) from [<c05ec328>]
(sh_cmt_clock_event_suspend+0x18/0x28)
[<c05ec328>] (sh_cmt_clock_event_suspend) from [<c027f9a4>]
(clockevents_suspend+0x40/0x54)
[<c027f9a4>] (clockevents_suspend) from [<c0276d48>]
(timekeeping_suspend+0x23c/0x278)
[<c0276d48>] (timekeeping_suspend) from [<c04cbb88>]
(syscore_suspend+0x88/0x138)
[<c04cbb88>] (syscore_suspend) from [<c025f618>]
(suspend_devices_and_enter+0x290/0x470)
[<c025f618>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c025fa20>]
(pm_suspend+0x228/0x280)
[<c025fa20>] (pm_suspend) from [<c025e60c>] (state_store+0xac/0xcc)
[<c025e60c>] (state_store) from [<c0340c4c>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x160/0x19c)
[<c0340c4c>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c02e3054>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0x108)
[<c02e3054>] (__vfs_write) from [<c02e4424>] (vfs_write+0xb8/0x144)
[<c02e4424>] (vfs_write) from [<c02e5014>] (SyS_write+0x40/0x80)
[<c02e5014>] (SyS_write) from [<c0206cc0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x34)
Reverting the commit fixes the issue.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks
2017-02-07 13:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-02-07 15:07 ` Ulf Hansson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2017-02-07 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM list, Len Brown, Pavel Machek,
Kevin Hilman, Lina Iyer, Jon Hunter, Marek Szyprowski,
Brian Norris, Linux-Renesas
On 7 February 2017 at 14:23, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Ulf, Rafael,
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> As the PM core may invoke the *noirq() callbacks asynchronously, the
>> current lock-less approach in genpd doesn't work. The consequence is that
>> we may find concurrent operations racing to power on/off the PM domain.
>>
>> As of now, no immediate errors has been reported, but it's probably only a
>> matter time. Therefor let's fix the problem now before this becomes a real
>> issue, by deploying the locking scheme to the relevant functions.
>>
>> Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>
> This is commit ef4f7e2c8335a56b in pm/linux-next.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> index fd2e3e1..6b23d82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> @@ -729,16 +729,17 @@ static bool genpd_dev_active_wakeup(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>
>> @@ -1070,13 +1070,17 @@ static void genpd_syscore_switch(struct device *dev, bool suspend)
>> if (!pm_genpd_present(genpd))
>> return;
>>
>> + genpd_lock(genpd);
>> +
>> if (suspend) {
>> genpd->suspended_count++;
>> - genpd_sync_power_off(genpd);
>> + genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, 0);
>> } else {
>> - genpd_sync_power_on(genpd);
>> + genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, 0);
>> genpd->suspended_count--;
>> }
>> +
>> + genpd_unlock(genpd);
>> }
>
> This causes the following BUG on all my Renesas arm32 boards, where the
> system timer is an IRQ safe device:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:232
> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 1751, name: s2ram
> CPU: 0 PID: 1751 Comm: s2ram Not tainted
> 4.10.0-rc7-koelsch-05643-g27f4c73972a614fe #3354
> Hardware name: Generic R8A7791 (Flattened Device Tree)
> [<c020e9c4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c020a40c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c020a40c>] (show_stack) from [<c03f9818>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c)
> [<c03f9818>] (dump_stack) from [<c0240020>] (___might_sleep+0x124/0x160)
> [<c0240020>] (___might_sleep) from [<c06fedfc>] (mutex_lock+0x18/0x60)
> [<c06fedfc>] (mutex_lock) from [<c04de340>] (genpd_syscore_switch+0x2c/0x7c)
> [<c04de340>] (genpd_syscore_switch) from [<c05ec328>]
> (sh_cmt_clock_event_suspend+0x18/0x28)
> [<c05ec328>] (sh_cmt_clock_event_suspend) from [<c027f9a4>]
> (clockevents_suspend+0x40/0x54)
> [<c027f9a4>] (clockevents_suspend) from [<c0276d48>]
> (timekeeping_suspend+0x23c/0x278)
> [<c0276d48>] (timekeeping_suspend) from [<c04cbb88>]
> (syscore_suspend+0x88/0x138)
> [<c04cbb88>] (syscore_suspend) from [<c025f618>]
> (suspend_devices_and_enter+0x290/0x470)
> [<c025f618>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c025fa20>]
> (pm_suspend+0x228/0x280)
> [<c025fa20>] (pm_suspend) from [<c025e60c>] (state_store+0xac/0xcc)
> [<c025e60c>] (state_store) from [<c0340c4c>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x160/0x19c)
> [<c0340c4c>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c02e3054>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0x108)
> [<c02e3054>] (__vfs_write) from [<c02e4424>] (vfs_write+0xb8/0x144)
> [<c02e4424>] (vfs_write) from [<c02e5014>] (SyS_write+0x40/0x80)
> [<c02e5014>] (SyS_write) from [<c0206cc0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x34)
>
> Reverting the commit fixes the issue.
Geert, thanks for reporting! Instead of a revert, I believe a better
option is to only partly revert the change.
What I suggest is to keep the locks for the *noirq() callbacks, but
remove it for the pm_genpd_syscore* functions.
Actually the change-log I wrote for the related commit, don't mention
the changes it introduces to the syscore API - my bad! I apologize for
the inconvenience.
Allow me to send a fix on top asap. Whether Rafael can fold it into
the existing commit or add on top, I leave to him to decide.
Kind regards
Uffe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-07 15:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-12 17:17 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks Ulf Hansson
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Rename functions in genpd for power on/off Ulf Hansson
2017-01-13 19:53 ` Kevin Hilman
2017-01-12 17:17 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] PM / Domains: Fix asynchronous execution of *noirq() callbacks Ulf Hansson
2017-02-07 13:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-07 15:07 ` Ulf Hansson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).