From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leonard Crestez Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: imx: gpc: Do not print error message for EPROBE_DEFER Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:28:03 +0300 Message-ID: <1491301683.1654.8.camel@nxp.com> References: <1491299184.2367.12.camel@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1491299184.2367.12.camel@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lucas Stach Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Mark Brown , Robin Gong , Anson Huang , Irina Tirdea , Fabio Estevam , Octavian Purdila , Liam Girdwood , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 11:46 +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 31.03.2017, 22:25 +0300 schrieb Leonard Crestez: > > > > The pu regulator request will return -EPROBE_DEFER if it has a supply > > from PMIC and this supply is not yet registered. This does not represent > > an error since the driver will call probe again later, so only print a > > warning message in this case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea > > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez > > --- > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 6 +++++- > The driver moved places, together with a large rewrite, to > drivers/soc/imx/. > > This issue isn't present in the new driver, so this patch can just be > dropped. Wait, I'm confused. In what tree did that happen? This patch is against linus's tree as of last week and there is nothing in drivers/soc/imx. I saw patches for a new gpcv2 driver but that seems to be only for imx7. This patch is for imx6. Will that driver also support imx6? Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/28/834 -- Regards, Leonard