From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leonard Crestez Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: imx: Set LDO regulator supply Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:28:01 +0300 Message-ID: <1492594081.15137.0.camel@nxp.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-cys01nam02on0085.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.37.85]:55264 "EHLO NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761616AbdDSJ2K (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:28:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar Cc: Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , Lucas Stach , Mark Brown , Robin Gong , Anson Huang , Irina Tirdea , Fabio Estevam , Octavian Purdila , Liam Girdwood , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 20:04 +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote: > Setting the LDO regulator parent is optional but beneficial. It will cause > the PMIC output voltage to be dynamically set to the minimum input for the > LDOs, this should be more efficient. > > This propagation was introduced by: > commit fc42112c0eaa ("regulator: core: Propagate voltage changes to supply > regulators") > > Changes since v1: > * Drop patch 1 since it only avoids logging a warning and the gpc driver > is going through more changes. > * Initialize cpufreq->suspend_freq based on policy->max instead. > * Remove reference to ldo-bypass from suspend_freq patch message. Hello, This is a gentle reminder that this was sent ~2 weeks ago and patches 1 and 2 are still waiting (with no objections). Patches 3/4 were applied. -- Regards, Leonard