[PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: add const to thermal_cooling_device_ops structure

[PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: add const to thermal_cooling_device_ops structure

[Bhumika Goyal]

Declare thermal_cooling_device_ops structure as const as it is only passed
as an argument to the function thermal_cooling_device_register and this
argument is of type const. So, declare the structure as const.

Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
index d718cd1..e4c68b7 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int powerclamp_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
 }
 
 /* bind to generic thermal layer as cooling device*/
-static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
+static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
 	.get_max_state = powerclamp_get_max_state,
 	.get_cur_state = powerclamp_get_cur_state,
 	.set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: add const to thermal_cooling_device_ops structure

[Zhang Rui]

On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 12:39 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> Declare thermal_cooling_device_ops structure as const as it is only
> passed
> as an argument to the function thermal_cooling_device_register and
> this
> argument is of type const. So, declare the structure as const.
> 
I checked the source and the code is written in this way as well in
some other drivers, why not fix them altogether?

thanks,
rui
> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> index d718cd1..e4c68b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int powerclamp_set_cur_state(struct
> thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>  }
>  
>  /* bind to generic thermal layer as cooling device*/
> -static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
> +static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
> powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
>  	.get_max_state = powerclamp_get_max_state,
>  	.get_cur_state = powerclamp_get_cur_state,
>  	.set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,

Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: add const to thermal_cooling_device_ops structure

[Bhumika Goyal]

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 12:39 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
>> Declare thermal_cooling_device_ops structure as const as it is only
>> passed
>> as an argument to the function thermal_cooling_device_register and
>> this
>> argument is of type const. So, declare the structure as const.
>>
> I checked the source and the code is written in this way as well in
> some other drivers, why not fix them altogether?
>

Hey,

I have already sent the patches for the drivers requiring this change.
Some of them got applied as well.

Thanks,
Bhumika

> thanks,
> rui
>> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> index d718cd1..e4c68b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int powerclamp_set_cur_state(struct
>> thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>>  }
>>
>>  /* bind to generic thermal layer as cooling device*/
>> -static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
>> +static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
>> powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
>>       .get_max_state = powerclamp_get_max_state,
>>       .get_cur_state = powerclamp_get_cur_state,
>>       .set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,

Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: add const to thermal_cooling_device_ops structure

[Zhang Rui]

On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 10:41 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 12:39 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> > > 
> > > Declare thermal_cooling_device_ops structure as const as it is
> > > only
> > > passed
> > > as an argument to the function thermal_cooling_device_register
> > > and
> > > this
> > > argument is of type const. So, declare the structure as const.
> > > 
> > I checked the source and the code is written in this way as well in
> > some other drivers, why not fix them altogether?
> > 
> Hey,
> 
> I have already sent the patches for the drivers requiring this
> change.
> Some of them got applied as well.

I mean the other drivers that use thermal_cooling_device_ops.

Surely I can applied this patch, but still it would be nice if you can
check the other places that defines thermal_cooling_device_ops and fix
all of them in one time. :)

thanks,
rui
> 
> Thanks,
> Bhumika
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > rui
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > index d718cd1..e4c68b7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int powerclamp_set_cur_state(struct
> > > thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> > >  }
> > > 
> > >  /* bind to generic thermal layer as cooling device*/
> > > -static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops
> > > = {
> > > +static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
> > > powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
> > >       .get_max_state = powerclamp_get_max_state,
> > >       .get_cur_state = powerclamp_get_cur_state,
> > >       .set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,

Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: add const to thermal_cooling_device_ops structure

[Bhumika Goyal]

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 10:41 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 12:39 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Declare thermal_cooling_device_ops structure as const as it is
>> > > only
>> > > passed
>> > > as an argument to the function thermal_cooling_device_register
>> > > and
>> > > this
>> > > argument is of type const. So, declare the structure as const.
>> > >
>> > I checked the source and the code is written in this way as well in
>> > some other drivers, why not fix them altogether?
>> >
>> Hey,
>>
>> I have already sent the patches for the drivers requiring this
>> change.
>> Some of them got applied as well.
>
> I mean the other drivers that use thermal_cooling_device_ops.
>

Actually, I also meant the same but maybe I wasn't clear enough :)

> Surely I can applied this patch, but still it would be nice if you can
> check the other places that defines thermal_cooling_device_ops and fix
> all of them in one time. :)
>

I checked again and there remains only one file in power/supply where
thermal_cooling_device_ops can be made const. I will submit a patch
for it but I think I will have to create a separate patch because the
maintainers are different.
All other places are either already const or I have submitted patches
for them or cannot be made const.

Thanks,
Bhumika

> thanks,
> rui
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bhumika
>>
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> > rui
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 2 +-
>> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> > > index d718cd1..e4c68b7 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
>> > > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int powerclamp_set_cur_state(struct
>> > > thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>> > >  }
>> > >
>> > >  /* bind to generic thermal layer as cooling device*/
>> > > -static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops
>> > > = {
>> > > +static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
>> > > powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
>> > >       .get_max_state = powerclamp_get_max_state,
>> > >       .get_cur_state = powerclamp_get_cur_state,
>> > >       .set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,

Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: add const to thermal_cooling_device_ops structure

[Zhang Rui]

On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 11:26 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 10:41 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 12:39 +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Declare thermal_cooling_device_ops structure as const as it
> > > > > is
> > > > > only
> > > > > passed
> > > > > as an argument to the function
> > > > > thermal_cooling_device_register
> > > > > and
> > > > > this
> > > > > argument is of type const. So, declare the structure as
> > > > > const.
> > > > > 
> > > > I checked the source and the code is written in this way as
> > > > well in
> > > > some other drivers, why not fix them altogether?
> > > > 
> > > Hey,
> > > 
> > > I have already sent the patches for the drivers requiring this
> > > change.
> > > Some of them got applied as well.
> > I mean the other drivers that use thermal_cooling_device_ops.
> > 
> Actually, I also meant the same but maybe I wasn't clear enough :)
> 
> > 
> > Surely I can applied this patch, but still it would be nice if you
> > can
> > check the other places that defines thermal_cooling_device_ops and
> > fix
> > all of them in one time. :)
> > 
> I checked again and there remains only one file in power/supply where
> thermal_cooling_device_ops can be made const. I will submit a patch
> for it but I think I will have to create a separate patch because the
> maintainers are different.
> All other places are either already const


>  or I have submitted patches
> for them

am I in the loop of the patches? because I was not aware of those
changes.

thanks,
rui
>  or cannot be made const.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bhumika
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > rui
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bhumika
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > rui
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > > > b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > > > index d718cd1..e4c68b7 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> > > > > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int
> > > > > powerclamp_set_cur_state(struct
> > > > > thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> > > > >  }
> > > > > 
> > > > >  /* bind to generic thermal layer as cooling device*/
> > > > > -static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
> > > > > powerclamp_cooling_ops
> > > > > = {
> > > > > +static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
> > > > > powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
> > > > >       .get_max_state = powerclamp_get_max_state,
> > > > >       .get_cur_state = powerclamp_get_cur_state,
> > > > >       .set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,