From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Improve IO performance
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 20:45:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501645506-29398-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In the current implementation the latency from SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT is
set to actual P-state adjustment can be upto 10ms. This can be improved
by reacting to SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT by jumping to max P-state immediately
. With this change the IO performance improves significantly.
With a simple "grep -r . linux" (Here linux is kernel source folder) with
dropped caches every time on a platform with per core P-states on a
Broadwell Xeon workstation, the user and system time improves as much as
30% to 40%.
The same performance difference was not observed on clients, which don't
have per core P-state support.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 8c67b77..7762255 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1527,6 +1527,15 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT) {
cpu->iowait_boost = int_tofp(1);
+ /*
+ * The last time the busy was 100% so P-state was max anyway
+ * so avoid overhead of computation.
+ */
+ if (fp_toint(cpu->sample.busy_scaled) == 100) {
+ cpu->last_update = time;
+ return;
+ }
+ goto set_pstate;
} else if (cpu->iowait_boost) {
/* Clear iowait_boost if the CPU may have been idle. */
delta_ns = time - cpu->last_update;
@@ -1538,6 +1547,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_util(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time,
if ((s64)delta_ns < INTEL_PSTATE_DEFAULT_SAMPLING_INTERVAL)
return;
+set_pstate:
if (intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time)) {
int target_pstate;
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-02 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 3:45 Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2017-08-04 0:34 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Improve IO performance Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-04 1:47 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501645506-29398-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).