From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zhang Rui Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Potential error pointer dereferences Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:00:33 +0800 Message-ID: <1502416833.2598.3.camel@intel.com> References: <20170710072422.rs25i5oawmiaofrp@mwanda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170710072422.rs25i5oawmiaofrp@mwanda> Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Carpenter , Eduardo Valentin Cc: Keerthy , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 10:24 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data() can return error pointers so we should > check for that.  There is no need to check "data->ti_thermal" for > NULL > and we removed that from the other cleanup function so we may as well > from it in ti_thermal_remove_sensor() to be consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > index c211a8e4a210..9fea354ca90c 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int ti_thermal_remove_sensor(struct ti_bandgap > *bgp, int id) >   >   data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id); >   > - if (data && data->ti_thermal) { > + if (data && !IS_ERR(data)) { what about if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data)) thanks, rui >   if (data->our_zone) >   thermal_zone_device_unregister(data- > >ti_thermal); >   } > @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct > ti_bandgap *bgp, int id) >   >   data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id); >   > - if (data) { > + if (data && !IS_ERR(data)) { >   cpufreq_cooling_unregister(data->cool_dev); >   cpufreq_cpu_put(data->policy); >   }