From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: rockchip: add driver Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:54:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1505152.fhSnu3pvDr@diego> References: <1458303004-26445-1-git-send-email-xf@rock-chips.com> <1787319.AFAWVqkdk0@diego> <20160321095049.GD27778@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:44928 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752002AbcCUJy5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:54:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160321095049.GD27778@vireshk-i7> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Feng Xiao , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, wxt@rock-chips.com, zyw@rock-chips.com, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, tim.chen@rock-chips.com, xxx@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com, Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette Am Montag, 21. M=E4rz 2016, 15:20:49 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 18-03-16, 13:56, Heiko St=FCbner wrote: > > Also, on both the rk3368 as well as the rk3399, you probably want t= he > > cluster- handling of arm-bL-cpufreq-dt. > > Contrary to its name it is _not_ limited to switching between clust= ers, > > but > > can also control frequencies of multiple cpu-clusters running at th= e same > > time. >=20 > We aren't adding any new users to bL driver, please use cpufreq-dt as= that > also supports multiple clusters now. I hadn't seen that yet ... nice that cpufreq-dt now also supports clust= ers :-) The other part still stands though, as we probably should register the=20 platform-device somewhere else and not in some new special module. When everything is using cpufreq-dt now, I guess we could just add it t= o the=20 core rockchip clk-code. Or was there some agreement where this should b= e done=20 (obviously not the devicetree itself)?