linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
Cc: Anson Huang <anson.huang@nxp.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG] schedutil governor produces regular max freq spikes because of lockup detector watchdog threads
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 22:37:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515184652.6892.26.camel@nxp.com> (raw)

Hello,

When using the schedutil governor together with the softlockup detector
all CPUs go to their maximum frequency on a regular basis. This seems
to be because the watchdog creates a RT thread on each CPU and this
causes regular kicks with:

    cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);

The schedutil governor responds to this by immediately setting the
maximum cpu frequency, this is very undesirable.

The issue can be fixed by this patch from android:
    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9301909/

The patch stalled in a long discussion about how it's difficult for
cpufreq to deal with RT and how some RT users might just disable
cpufreq. It is indeed hard but if the system experiences regular power
kicks from a common debug feature they will end up disabling schedutil
instead. No other governors behave this way, perhaps the current
behavior should be considered a bug in schedutil.

That patch now has conflicts with latest upstream. Perhaps a modified
variant should be reconsidered for inclusion, or is there some other
solution pending?

Alternatively the watchdog threads could be somehow marked as to never
cause increased cpufreq.

--
Regards,
Leonard

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-05 20:37 Leonard Crestez [this message]
2018-01-05 22:18 ` [BUG] schedutil governor produces regular max freq spikes because of lockup detector watchdog threads Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-08  4:01   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-08 13:10     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-08 13:20     ` Leonard Crestez
2018-01-08 15:14       ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-01-08 15:51         ` Leonard Crestez
2018-01-09  1:17           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 14:43             ` Leonard Crestez
2018-01-09 15:16               ` Lucas Stach
2018-01-09 15:50               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 10:54                 ` Juri Lelli
2018-01-10 12:35                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 14:21                     ` Juri Lelli
2018-01-11  1:20                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10  4:08               ` Viresh Kumar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-06 16:12 Doug Smythies

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1515184652.6892.26.camel@nxp.com \
    --to=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=anson.huang@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=smuckle@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).