From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
Valentin Manea <valy@mrs.ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:54:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515675277.7000.917.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gg8Pn8AU8auPMT+DYVoUK6TmsRUfK+E8RWfThbLPQ+PQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 23:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 13:26 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Just a nitpick: Can we leave S2IDLE instead of S2I?
> > Would it make sense for potential code readers?
>
> I wanted it to be shorter, but if that is a problem, I'd rather call
> it PLATFORM than S2IDLE (as technically they are related to the
> low-power mode of the platform).
It's not problem per se, though without a context it would take time to
get into S2I acronym from the code for not familiar reader.
> I'll send an update shortly.
Thanks!
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-11 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 12:22 [PATCH 0/2] Suspend-to-idle fixes for Surface Pro3 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / PM: Use Low Power S0 Idle on more systems Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-01-10 22:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-11 12:54 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2018-01-11 1:13 ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-11 12:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-01-10 17:38 ` [PATCH " Mario.Limonciello
2018-01-10 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-11 15:51 ` Mario.Limonciello
2018-01-10 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: surfacepro3: Support for wakeup from suspend-to-idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-10 13:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515675277.7000.917.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=valy@mrs.ro \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).