linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] opp: cpu: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table
@ 2018-01-26  8:48 Jia-Ju Bai
  2018-02-08 14:45 ` Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jia-Ju Bai @ 2018-01-26  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vireshk, nm, sboyd; +Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, Jia-Ju Bai

After checking all possible call chains to 
dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() here,
my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context, 
namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
And dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() calls dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(), 
which calls mutex_lock that can sleep.
It indicates that atmtcp_v_send() can call functions which may sleep.
Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/opp/cpu.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/opp/cpu.c b/drivers/opp/cpu.c
index 2d87bc1..0c09107 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/cpu.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
 	if (max_opps <= 0)
 		return max_opps ? max_opps : -ENODATA;
 
-	freq_table = kcalloc((max_opps + 1), sizeof(*freq_table), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	freq_table = kcalloc((max_opps + 1), sizeof(*freq_table), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!freq_table)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] opp: cpu: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table
  2018-01-26  8:48 [PATCH] opp: cpu: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table Jia-Ju Bai
@ 2018-02-08 14:45 ` Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2018-02-08 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jia-Ju Bai; +Cc: vireshk, nm, sboyd, linux-pm, linux-kernel

On 26-01-18, 16:48, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> After checking all possible call chains to 
> dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() here,
> my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context, 
> namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
> And dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() calls dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(), 
> which calls mutex_lock that can sleep.
> It indicates that atmtcp_v_send() can call functions which may sleep.
> Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/opp/cpu.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/cpu.c b/drivers/opp/cpu.c
> index 2d87bc1..0c09107 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/cpu.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
>  	if (max_opps <= 0)
>  		return max_opps ? max_opps : -ENODATA;
>  
> -	freq_table = kcalloc((max_opps + 1), sizeof(*freq_table), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	freq_table = kcalloc((max_opps + 1), sizeof(*freq_table), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!freq_table)
>  		return -ENOMEM;

Applied thanks.

-- 
viresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-08 14:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-26  8:48 [PATCH] opp: cpu: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table Jia-Ju Bai
2018-02-08 14:45 ` Viresh Kumar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).