linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PM / core: Fix extra pm_runtime_enable on resume
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:10:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1537913455-43397-1-git-send-email-alcooperx@gmail.com> (raw)

Matching pm_runtime_disable/pm_runtime_enable routines should be
called for "direct_complete" devices during suspend/resume and there
are cases where the pm_runtime_disable is skipped during suspend but
pm_runtime_enable is still called during resume. This is a problem
because the runtime enable state is really a counter and this can
incorrectly enable pm_runtime when it should not be enabled. This
happens for any direct_complete device doing an async suspend after
the global variable "async_error" is set (which is set by any sync
or async device's suspend error or early wake condition).

This failure is very timing dependent but for testing and debug
the following changes will make it happen more frequently.
- Add an msleep(500) as the first line in async_suspend() in
  drivers/base/power/main.c
- Modify alarmtimer_suspend in kernel/time/alarmtimer.c to just
  return -EBUSY

To see the failure condition that's been fixed with this patch,
enable dynamic debug for drivers/power/main.c and then run
"rtcwake -s 2 -m standby" and grep for
"skipping runtime enable during resume" messages.

Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/pm.h        |  1 +
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index 3f68e2919dc5..2dc40662aae0 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -945,7 +945,13 @@ static int device_resume(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state, bool async)
 
 	if (dev->power.direct_complete) {
 		/* Match the pm_runtime_disable() in __device_suspend(). */
-		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+		if (dev->power.pm_runtime_disabled) {
+			pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+			dev->power.pm_runtime_disabled = false;
+		} else {
+			pm_dev_dbg(dev, state,
+				   "skipping runtime enable during ");
+		}
 		goto Complete;
 	}
 
@@ -1736,8 +1742,19 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state, bool async)
 	if (dev->power.direct_complete) {
 		if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
 			pm_runtime_disable(dev);
-			if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
+			if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+				/*
+				 * If any device's sync or async suspend fails
+				 * and sets async_error, any async suspend for
+				 * direct_complete devices after the failure
+				 * will not execute the pm_runtime_disable
+				 * above. This flag lets the async device's
+				 * resume function (which is always run) know
+				 * if a matching pm_runtime_enable is needed.
+				 */
+				dev->power.pm_runtime_disabled = true;
 				goto Complete;
+			}
 
 			pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 		}
diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
index e723b78d8357..45738ad977fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm.h
@@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
 	bool			is_late_suspended:1;
 	bool			early_init:1;	/* Owned by the PM core */
 	bool			direct_complete:1;	/* Owned by the PM core */
+	unsigned int		pm_runtime_disabled:1;
 	u32			driver_flags;
 	spinlock_t		lock;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-- 
1.9.0.138.g2de3478

             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-25 22:10 Al Cooper [this message]
2018-09-27 21:46 ` [PATCH] PM / core: Fix extra pm_runtime_enable on resume Pavel Machek
2018-10-03  8:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1537913455-43397-1-git-send-email-alcooperx@gmail.com \
    --to=alcooperx@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).