From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 02:37:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1545936.F2oyWdN6Zx@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2730042.XLMy9dAKI1@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160908002226.GC15431@graphite.smuckle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:52408 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751673AbcIHAba (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:31:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160908002226.GC15431@graphite.smuckle.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Muckle Cc: Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Srinivas Pandruvada , Peter Zijlstra , Viresh Kumar , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Doug Smythies On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:22:26 PM Steve Muckle wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Please let me know what you think and if you can run some benchmarks you > > care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way or another), > > please do that and let me know what you've found. > > LGTM (I just reviewed the first and last patch, skipping the > intel_pstate ones). > > I was unable to see a conclusive power regression in Android audio, video or > idle usecases on my hikey 96board. Cool, thanks!