From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq_stats in the absence of frequency table Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 01:27:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1547887.jMFZtBx5tV@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1470179937-14698-1-git-send-email-pprakash@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:46797 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754585AbcHBX3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:29:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1470179937-14698-1-git-send-email-pprakash@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Prashanth Prakash Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, alexey.klimov@arm.com, hotran@apm.com, cov@codeaurora.org On Tuesday, August 02, 2016 05:18:57 PM Prashanth Prakash wrote: > cpufreq drivers such as CPPC works on contigious scale and does > not have a static frequency table. This commit adds cpufreq_stats > support for such drivers by creating a pseudo frequency table by > discretizing the contigious scale. No. And why? Thanks, Rafael