From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com,
rui.zhang@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH V2 12/13] int340X/processor_thermal_device: add support for MMIO RAPL
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 00:34:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1562258085-3165-13-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1562258085-3165-1-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com>
Introduce MMIO RAPL support as Intel processor_thermal device exposes the
capability to do RAPL control via MMIO registers.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig | 6 +
.../int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig
index 5333e01..7979075 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig
@@ -40,4 +40,10 @@ config INT3406_THERMAL
brightness in order to address a thermal condition or to reduce
power consumed by display device.
+config PROC_THERMAL_MMIO_RAPL
+ bool
+ depends on 64BIT
+ depends on POWERCAP
+ select INTEL_RAPL_CORE
+ default y
endif
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
index 53c84fa..06c7ab3 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/thermal.h>
+#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
+#include <linux/intel_rapl.h>
#include "int340x_thermal_zone.h"
#include "../intel_soc_dts_iosf.h"
@@ -37,6 +39,8 @@
/* GeminiLake thermal reporting device */
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_GLK_THERMAL 0x318C
+#define DRV_NAME "proc_thermal"
+
struct power_config {
u32 index;
u32 min_uw;
@@ -52,6 +56,7 @@ struct proc_thermal_device {
struct power_config power_limits[2];
struct int34x_thermal_zone *int340x_zone;
struct intel_soc_dts_sensors *soc_dts;
+ void __iomem *mmio_base;
};
enum proc_thermal_emum_mode_type {
@@ -60,6 +65,12 @@ enum proc_thermal_emum_mode_type {
PROC_THERMAL_PLATFORM_DEV
};
+struct rapl_mmio_regs {
+ u64 reg_unit;
+ u64 regs[RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX][RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_MAX];
+ int limits[RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX];
+};
+
/*
* We can have only one type of enumeration, PCI or Platform,
* not both. So we don't need instance specific data.
@@ -367,8 +378,151 @@ static irqreturn_t proc_thermal_pci_msi_irq(int irq, void *devid)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_THERMAL_MMIO_RAPL
+
+#define MCHBAR 0
+
+/* RAPL Support via MMIO interface */
+static struct rapl_if_priv rapl_mmio_priv;
+
+static int rapl_mmio_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct rapl_package *rp;
+
+ /* mmio rapl supports package 0 only for now */
+ if (topology_physical_package_id(cpu))
+ return 0;
+
+ rp = rapl_find_package_domain(cpu, &rapl_mmio_priv);
+ if (!rp) {
+ rp = rapl_add_package(cpu, &rapl_mmio_priv);
+ if (IS_ERR(rp))
+ return PTR_ERR(rp);
+ }
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &rp->cpumask);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rapl_mmio_cpu_down_prep(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct rapl_package *rp;
+ int lead_cpu;
+
+ rp = rapl_find_package_domain(cpu, &rapl_mmio_priv);
+ if (!rp)
+ return 0;
+
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &rp->cpumask);
+ lead_cpu = cpumask_first(&rp->cpumask);
+ if (lead_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ rapl_remove_package(rp);
+ else if (rp->lead_cpu == cpu)
+ rp->lead_cpu = lead_cpu;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rapl_mmio_read_raw(int cpu, struct reg_action *ra)
+{
+ if (!ra->reg)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ra->value = readq((void __iomem *)ra->reg);
+ ra->value &= ra->mask;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rapl_mmio_write_raw(int cpu, struct reg_action *ra)
+{
+ u64 val;
+
+ if (!ra->reg)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ val = readq((void __iomem *)ra->reg);
+ val &= ~ra->mask;
+ val |= ra->value;
+ writeq(val, (void __iomem *)ra->reg);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int proc_thermal_rapl_add(struct pci_dev *pdev,
+ struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv,
+ struct rapl_mmio_regs *rapl_regs)
+{
+ enum rapl_domain_reg_id reg;
+ enum rapl_domain_type domain;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!rapl_regs)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << MCHBAR, DRV_NAME);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot reserve PCI memory region\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ proc_priv->mmio_base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[MCHBAR];
+
+ for (domain = RAPL_DOMAIN_PACKAGE; domain < RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX; domain++) {
+ for (reg = RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_LIMIT; reg < RAPL_DOMAIN_REG_MAX; reg++)
+ if (rapl_regs->regs[domain][reg])
+ rapl_mmio_priv.regs[domain][reg] =
+ (u64)proc_priv->mmio_base +
+ rapl_regs->regs[domain][reg];
+ rapl_mmio_priv.limits[domain] = rapl_regs->limits[domain];
+ }
+ rapl_mmio_priv.reg_unit = (u64)proc_priv->mmio_base + rapl_regs->reg_unit;
+
+ rapl_mmio_priv.read_raw = rapl_mmio_read_raw;
+ rapl_mmio_priv.write_raw = rapl_mmio_write_raw;
+
+ rapl_mmio_priv.control_type = powercap_register_control_type(NULL, "intel-rapl-mmio", NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(rapl_mmio_priv.control_type)) {
+ pr_debug("failed to register powercap control_type.\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(rapl_mmio_priv.control_type);
+ }
+
+ ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "powercap/rapl:online",
+ rapl_mmio_cpu_online, rapl_mmio_cpu_down_prep);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ powercap_unregister_control_type(rapl_mmio_priv.control_type);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ rapl_mmio_priv.pcap_rapl_online = ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void proc_thermal_rapl_remove(void)
+{
+ cpuhp_remove_state(rapl_mmio_priv.pcap_rapl_online);
+ powercap_unregister_control_type(rapl_mmio_priv.control_type);
+}
+
+static const struct rapl_mmio_regs rapl_mmio_hsw = {
+ .reg_unit = 0x5938,
+ .regs[RAPL_DOMAIN_PACKAGE] = { 0x59a0, 0x593c, 0x58f0, 0, 0x5930},
+ .regs[RAPL_DOMAIN_DRAM] = { 0x58e0, 0x58e8, 0x58ec, 0, 0},
+ .limits[RAPL_DOMAIN_PACKAGE] = 2,
+ .limits[RAPL_DOMAIN_DRAM] = 2,
+};
+
+#else
+
+static int proc_thermal_rapl_add(struct pci_dev *pdev,
+ struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv,
+ struct rapl_mmio_regs *rapl_regs)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+static void proc_thermal_rapl_remove(void) {}
+static const struct rapl_mmio_regs rapl_mmio_hsw;
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_MMIO_RAPL */
+
static int proc_thermal_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
- const struct pci_device_id *unused)
+ const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv;
int ret;
@@ -378,15 +532,21 @@ static int proc_thermal_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
return -ENODEV;
}
- ret = pci_enable_device(pdev);
+ ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error: could not enable device\n");
return ret;
}
ret = proc_thermal_add(&pdev->dev, &proc_priv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = proc_thermal_rapl_add(pdev, proc_priv,
+ (struct rapl_mmio_regs *)id->driver_data);
if (ret) {
- pci_disable_device(pdev);
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add RAPL MMIO interface\n");
+ proc_thermal_remove(proc_priv);
return ret;
}
@@ -439,14 +599,15 @@ static void proc_thermal_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pci_disable_msi(pdev);
}
}
+ proc_thermal_rapl_remove();
proc_thermal_remove(proc_priv);
- pci_disable_device(pdev);
}
static const struct pci_device_id proc_thermal_pci_ids[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_BDW_THERMAL)},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_HSB_THERMAL)},
- { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_SKL_THERMAL)},
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_SKL_THERMAL),
+ .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&rapl_mmio_hsw, },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_BSW_THERMAL)},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_BXT0_THERMAL)},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PROC_BXT1_THERMAL)},
@@ -461,7 +622,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id proc_thermal_pci_ids[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, proc_thermal_pci_ids);
static struct pci_driver proc_thermal_pci_driver = {
- .name = "proc_thermal",
+ .name = DRV_NAME,
.probe = proc_thermal_pci_probe,
.remove = proc_thermal_pci_remove,
.id_table = proc_thermal_pci_ids,
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-04 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-04 16:34 [PATCH V2 00/13] intel_rapl: RAPL abstraction and MMIO RAPL support Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 01/13] intel_rapl: use reg instead of msr Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 02/13] intel_rapl: remove hardcoded register index Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 03/13] intel_rapl: introduce intel_rapl.h Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 04/13] intel_rapl: introduce struct rapl_if_private Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 05/13] intel_rapl: abstract register address Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 06/13] intel_rapl: abstract register access operations Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 07/13] intel_rapl: cleanup some functions Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 08/13] intel_rapl: cleanup hardcoded MSR access Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 09/13] intel_rapl: abstract RAPL common code Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 10/13] intel_rapl: support 64 bit register Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 11/13] intel_rapl: support two power limits for every RAPL domain Zhang Rui
2019-07-04 16:34 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2019-07-04 16:34 ` [PATCH V2 13/13] intel_rapl: Fix module autoloading issue Zhang Rui
2019-07-05 8:57 ` [PATCH V2 00/13] intel_rapl: RAPL abstraction and MMIO RAPL support Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-05 14:59 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2019-07-06 8:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-08 6:53 ` Zhang Rui
2019-07-08 8:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-09 13:41 ` Zhang Rui
2019-07-09 13:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1562258085-3165-13-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).