linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: mark pm function __maybe_unused
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:34:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1562765663.2597.16.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708124743.3585020-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Hi, Arnd,

thanks for the report.

On 一, 2019-07-08 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Without CONFIG_PM, we get a harmless warning:
> 
> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c:446:
> 12: error: 'proc_thermal_resume' defined but not used [-
> Werror=unused-function]
>  static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> 
> Mark it __maybe_unused to shut up the warning.
> 
> Fixes: aaba9791fbb4 ("drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: Read PPCC
> on resume")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  .../thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c    | 2
> +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git
> a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> index a3210f09f366..5ce639a99330 100644
> ---
> a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> +++
> b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static void  proc_thermal_pci_remove(struct
> pci_dev *pdev)
>  	pci_disable_device(pdev);
>  }
>  
> -static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev;
>  
I'd rather prefer to add #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP for
proc_thermal_resume().
Just like the patch below, what do you think?

thanks,
rui

From 6c395f66e98c895cf3ebf87c0b2fc63b6a57a196 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 21:19:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] drivers: thermal: processor_thermal_device: Fix build warning

As a system sleep callback, proc_thermal_resume() should be defined only
if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.

This fixes a build warning when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set,
drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c:446:12: error: 'proc_thermal_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
 static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)

Fixes: aaba9791fbb4 ("drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: Read PPCC on resume")
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
index a3210f0..77dae1e 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ static void  proc_thermal_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	pci_disable_device(pdev);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev;
@@ -452,6 +453,9 @@ static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#else
+#define proc_thermal_resume NULL
+#endif
 
 static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(proc_thermal_pm, NULL, proc_thermal_resume);
 
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-10 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 12:47 [PATCH] drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: mark pm function __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-10 13:34 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2019-07-10 14:19   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1562765663.2597.16.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).