From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Call update_util_est() after dequeue_entities()
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 11:35:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15a0cfb8457b7d9d767e7f2d2bcfd56b155f6c0b.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512124653.305275-1-qyousef@layalina.io>
On Tue, 2026-05-12 at 13:46 +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> update_util_est() reads task_util() at dequeue which is updated in
> dequeue_entities(). To read the accurate util_avg at dequeue, make sure
> to do the read after load_avg is updated in dequeue_entities().
>
> util_est for a periodic task before
>
> periodic-3114 util_est.enqueued running
> ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> 183┤ ▖▗ ▐▖ ▖ ▗▙ ▗ ▗▙▖▖ ▖▖ ▖ ▖▖ ▗ ▟ ▗▄▖ │
> 139┤ ▐▛█▜▙▞▀▄▄▞▚▄▟█▞▙█▄▟▀▚▄▄▞▚▄▄▟▀▀▛▄▝▄▄▄▙█▛▛█▛▜▛▄▄▀▄█▙▛▛▛▙▄▀▄▄▖▜▄▟█▟▀▜▟▄▜▀▄▄▟▙▖ │
> 95┤ ▐▀ ▘ ▝ ▝ ▝▘ ▘ ▘▘ ▝▘ ▝▘ ▝ ▝ ▀ │
> │ ▛ │
> 51┤ ▐▘ │
> 7┤ ▖▗▗ ▗▄▐ │
> └┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬┘
> 0.00 0.65 1.30 1.96 2.61 3.26 3.91 4.57 5.22 5.87
>
> and after
>
> periodic-2977 util_est.enqueued running
> ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> 157.0┤ ▙▄ ▗▄ ▗▄▄▄ ▗▄ ▗▄▄▄▗▄▄ ▗▄▄▖ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▖▖ ▄▄▄▄▄▖▖▝▙▄▄▄▄▄▄▖ ▗▄ │
> 119.5┤ ▗▄▌▘▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▝▀▀▘▝▀▀▀ ▝▀▘ ▝▀▀▘ ▀▝▀▘▀▀▀▘▝▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▘▝▝▀▀ ▀ ▝▝▀ ▀ ▀▀▀▀ │
> 82.0┤ ▟ │
> │ ▌ │
> 44.5┤ ▌ │
> 7.0┤ ▗ ▗▖ ▌ │
> └┬─────────┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬─────────┬─────────┬──────────┬─────────┬─────────┬┘
> 0.00 0.65 1.30 1.95 2.60 3.25 3.90 4.56 5.21 5.86
>
> Note how the signal is noisier and can peak to 183 vs 157 now.
>
> Fixes: b55945c500c5 ("sched: Fix pick_next_task_fair() vs try_to_wake_up() race")
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
> ---
>
> This is split from [1] series where I stumbled upon this problem. AFAICS it
> needs backporting all the way to 6.12 LTS.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260504020003.71306-1-qyousef@layalina.io/
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 728965851842..96ba97e5f4ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7401,6 +7401,8 @@ static int dequeue_entities(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> */
> static bool dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> if (task_is_throttled(p)) {
> dequeue_throttled_task(p, flags);
> return true;
> @@ -7409,8 +7411,9 @@ static bool dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> if (!p->se.sched_delayed)
> util_est_dequeue(&rq->cfs, p);
>
> + ret = dequeue_entities(rq, &p->se, flags);
> util_est_update(&rq->cfs, p, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
I thought that util_est_update() was called intentionally before dequeue_entities
to update the utilization of task p up to this time right
before the dequeue. Then dequeue_entities() is called later
with up to date task utilization estimate of p.
Perhaps util_est_update() should be moved before
util_est_dequeue() so the updated utilization of p
is subtracted from the rq utilization.
@@ -8002,10 +8002,10 @@ static bool dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
return true;
}
+ util_est_update(&rq->cfs, p, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
if (!p->se.sched_delayed)
util_est_dequeue(&rq->cfs, p);
- util_est_update(&rq->cfs, p, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
if (dequeue_entities(rq, &p->se, flags) < 0)
return false;
Tim
> - if (dequeue_entities(rq, &p->se, flags) < 0)
> + if (ret < 0)
> return false;
>
> /*
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 12:46 [PATCH] sched/fair: Call update_util_est() after dequeue_entities() Qais Yousef
2026-05-12 20:52 ` John Stultz
2026-05-13 12:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-15 1:51 ` Qais Yousef
2026-05-15 15:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-15 18:35 ` Tim Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15a0cfb8457b7d9d767e7f2d2bcfd56b155f6c0b.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox