From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: instantiate cpufreq-cpu0 as a platform_driver Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:57:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1620717.9QAjdjU4WH@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1359428020-21068-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <2871120.foIQeGmlHR@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130130134939.GE2757@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130130134939.GE2757@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: "AnilKumar, Chimata" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Langsdorf , Tony Lindgren List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 09:49:41 PM Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:40:35PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Mark, AnilKumar, > > > > > > > > I only compile-tested it on highbank and omap2. Please give it a test > > > > no hardware to make sure cpufreq-cpu0 still works for you. Thanks. > > > > > > Hi Shawn, > > > > > > I hope this is based on linux-omap/master, to test the driver I have > > > to add some patches on top of this patch, because of recent changes. > > > I will provide the test details once I am done. > > > > Shawn, does it mean I need to wait with applying the patch or will OMAP2 > > work as is? > > > I would expect that omap2/am33xx should work as it is, but I do not > have hardware to confirm that. > > Also as the patch touches a few files in arch/arm/mach-omap2, we may > need an ACK from Tony. > > Actually, I prefer to move omap2 bits into a separate patch and have > it go via omap tree to avoid the possible conflict with cpufreq and > arm-soc tree. What do you say? If you agree, I will re-iterate the > patch to do so. Yes, please do as you think is appropriate. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.