From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: imx6: remove pu regulator dependency for SOCs with no PU regulator Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 02:06:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1700099.R5ebWUKAKG@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1403250138-25030-1-git-send-email-b20788@freescale.com> <20140718083116.GD8537@dragon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:59836 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755515AbaGRXro (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2014 19:47:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140718083116.GD8537@dragon> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: Anson Huang , viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday, July 18, 2014 04:31:18 PM Shawn Guo wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:42:18PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote: > > PU regulator is not a necessary regulator for cpufreq, not all > > i.MX6 SoCs have PU regulator, only if SOC has PU regulator, then its > > voltage must be equal to SOC regulator, so remove the dependency > > to support i.MX6SX which has no PU regulator. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang > > Rafael, > > Can you please apply this for 3.17? Thanks. Queued up for 3.17, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.