From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: use util_est for OPP selection
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 03:35:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1730241.78TPuThRce@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205171018.9203-5-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 6:10:18 PM CET Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> When schedutil looks at the CPU utilization, the current PELT value for
> that CPU is returned straight away. In certain scenarios this can have
> undesired side effects and delays on frequency selection.
>
> For example, since the task utilization is decayed at wakeup time, a
> long sleeping big task newly enqueued does not add immediately a
> significant contribution to the target CPU. This introduces some latency
> before schedutil will be able to detect the best frequency required by
> that task.
>
> Moreover, the PELT signal build-up time is function of the current
> frequency, because of the scale invariant load tracking support. Thus,
> starting from a lower frequency, the utilization build-up time will
> increase even more and further delays the selection of the actual
> frequency which better serves the task requirements.
>
> In order to reduce these kind of latencies, this patch integrates the
> usage of the CPU's estimated utilization in the sugov_get_util function.
>
> The estimated utilization of a CPU is defined to be the maximum between
> its PELT's utilization and the sum of the estimated utilization of each
> currently RUNNABLE task on that CPU.
> This allows to properly represent the expected utilization of a CPU which,
> for example, has just got a big task running after a long sleep period,
> and ultimately it allows to select the best frequency to run a task
> right after it wakes up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
>
> ---
> Changes v1->v2:
> - rebase on top of v4.15-rc2
> - tested that overhauled PELT code does not affect the util_est
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 2f52ec0f1539..465430d99440 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,11 @@ static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max, int cpu)
>
> cfs_max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu);
>
> - *util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg, cfs_max);
> + *util = rq->cfs.avg.util_avg;
I would use a local variable here.
That *util everywhere looks a bit dirtyish.
> + if (sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
> + *util = max(*util, rq->cfs.util_est_runnable);
> + *util = min(*util, cfs_max);
> +
> *max = cfs_max;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-16 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 17:10 [PATCH v2 0/4] Utilization estimation (util_est) for FAIR tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/fair: always used unsigned long for utilization Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-06 8:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-12-05 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/fair: add util_est on top of PELT Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-15 14:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-15 14:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-15 15:22 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-15 12:14 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-15 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-15 15:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-13 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-13 16:36 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 17:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-15 12:03 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-15 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-05 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched/fair: use util_est in LB and WU paths Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-05 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: use util_est for OPP selection Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-16 2:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-12-18 10:48 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Utilization estimation (util_est) for FAIR tasks Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-13 16:23 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 17:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-12-15 16:13 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-15 20:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-12-16 6:37 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1730241.78TPuThRce@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).