From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] drivercore / platform: Keep PM domain powered during ->probe() Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 01:21:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1760759.EbfNSUWGb7@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1413208930-26019-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20141031000749.GK36444@dtor-ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:57232 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753431AbaKAAAr (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 20:00:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Kevin Hilman , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-samsung-soc , Geert Uytterhoeven , Alan Stern , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tomasz Figa , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Philipp Zabel , Mark Brown , Wolfram Sang , Russell King , Jack Dai , Jinkun Hong , Aaron On Friday, October 31, 2014 10:23:00 AM Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 31 October 2014 01:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:47:27PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Ulf Hansson writes: > >> > >> > To sucessfully probe some devices their corresponding PM domains may > >> > need to be powered. > >> > >> Isn't that what pm_runtime_get*() is supposed to be doing? Why isn't > >> that working? > > > > Also, I do not understand why we placing device into a power domain only > > when we probe it. Why if I unbind device from its driver (or do not have > > a driver for it) it disappears from its power domain? To me power domain > > and having driver bound to a device are 2 orthogonal concepts. > > That's a different discussion, I don't think we want to go there > within this context. Why don't we, exactly? Rafael