From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D886B32ED50; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 11:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766489295; cv=none; b=TcW6js1Iw83Xd9c/yKK8Dv4uQBOsBSmM/yuvY3c15n6bDZVTL/LBaJO2PRqj3UWkjKG4zj+4zmmHrDL6PjsvKkMWtjDi/pGYAo9TDdSSAGZdsI4QAgguWAPVQHYnQKyho0Tt+hhJQvCGui80Wz677H6IiXNxL4S4FCpff0mExAU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766489295; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rdyBmgwaG/qEmPVoOSmwIO0N2ecEQV7lL40s7NnmKi8=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=noKZoUoVDQuxdhCBGexjEvCMTGhzloS7VberYzw6tCbW0/dMav8KaKmA1Cy3sC698PBTKEU4kDESZvdBrqfXt7p81aO7WelqhLX/3sbcmvTT2qAGee5jpkqqMV01ooiIHC+MhiPeG/WO6L0vsWJ3FVdnyiiG4a+A5GfoxileOxg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=KfaVu8by; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KfaVu8by" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41BC6C113D0; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 11:28:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766489295; bh=rdyBmgwaG/qEmPVoOSmwIO0N2ecEQV7lL40s7NnmKi8=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=KfaVu8byt0YzmwiPotEf2wnkhAaM52jN3z9YEFRZ+QC2eczG0fH/RYCfQ3w/or04O WCrOLOhVnXK8TKtMej/aWV1EO1bsh5MoE0a6k+GNYkzVU4wCnF9l4FaD+mpdaUkYng DBslroDFPUYJiTIJimKyLg5KVUCTc+30wSbgmKp6oF5YeHyhj99bXri10gMiTh81CD XtRMV0yOwneWtrkznTOZg7a4qlKzQ3YAG00rfKg5Gj2vm4xKHXVYV7JHIMEyYHP8rK y7UeR6iF/HLG2uG9PINtnjlGymMDCx8ykvxV6qqZaYzx0ym60Z9s+2vckEctwzOhQe HHNjYDkltA5Dg== From: Vinod Koul To: Linux PM , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , Ulf Hansson , Brian Norris In-Reply-To: <6245770.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <6245770.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki> Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v1 00/23] PM: runtime: Convert pm_runtime_put() to a void function Message-Id: <176648929390.697163.17518732693625217339.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:58:13 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:48:11 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This is something I have had on my todo list for some time, but it is > kind of tricky because the return value of pm_runtime_put() is used in > some places all over the tree. > > Nevertheless, I think that it is worth doing because the majority of > users of the pm_runtime_put() return value are at least somewhat > questionable (in fact, IMV the only legitimate use of it is in the > USB core where it is included in a debug message). > > [...] Applied, thanks! [21/23] dmaengine: sh: Discard pm_runtime_put() return value commit: b442377c0ea2044a8f50ffa3fe59448f9ed922c9 Best regards, -- ~Vinod