From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ACDB338927; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766511870; cv=none; b=kne7hnH/oi7fD6caU9PuEcGID3SlFZR/eKJnKyl2yOuNjodo9wCJohHU6YeHpsr4Hn17WUsv0oph3Osm2rn8iJLjjYTC4gz7R0D9xbauh3f3vN5x1qH6rhXGV+sNIARDlKeGgScPVRrIe7nsjmf8fzzFVXdNbx2Z1Bu/EIly3fY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766511870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QfnwP6g3xZyc9qS0ZVe4lcUJD+FmaQPSpWmATsSwLwg=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UdGYUDueWYfiW5mpU9Vb3xrXoEUxYWn69QMNflhfFwPsrsK52dGktVPdBE/j0GJAHcXZFalpYnaqHy5UTvWEPS5LgeX5orGCdjgFDzlByBYeD2YI3emRMyFcz9L9J38hC0OKVss7svkAvcmBQv9x90ma09B/6z9CrKMIB7Q5xUw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hp8Lc53E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hp8Lc53E" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D944C113D0; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766511869; bh=QfnwP6g3xZyc9qS0ZVe4lcUJD+FmaQPSpWmATsSwLwg=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=hp8Lc53E+roULdJGi8nNVCdOFZOj4ej522R5s0vXLxIhbW3PkknOgMvnyu4Y1akKE ROr8nmuY3C35WGHDYTvja18GMifaHlMl1N9reCfXDBmdY1gLYl+rZ/G91eOc3un3xM 2HuwekgGq20MVunBhsVIX/siQi5MK1Ty42v4ZsLc/iq5NZ1Li+pCwYWjyfOAGjHAnt IBW3l2p9z04VqgMKlsuwGUhwU1IZBm060VDw6VhWYp5q9Rt2aK60k67LrgmKIUBRm9 t8YCosA6KTxPW/x569a7f+KVh0CRQTZ3FZ0uLHWmebvYBon8ZnjNlc1elx8SfItm8H 04RwnURXY4vpQ== From: Vinod Koul To: Linux PM , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , Ulf Hansson , Brian Norris In-Reply-To: <6245770.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <6245770.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki> Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v1 00/23] PM: runtime: Convert pm_runtime_put() to a void function Message-Id: <176651186788.759340.13138612907596077683.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:14:27 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:48:11 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This is something I have had on my todo list for some time, but it is > kind of tricky because the return value of pm_runtime_put() is used in > some places all over the tree. > > Nevertheless, I think that it is worth doing because the majority of > users of the pm_runtime_put() return value are at least somewhat > questionable (in fact, IMV the only legitimate use of it is in the > USB core where it is included in a debug message). > > [...] Applied, thanks! [13/23] phy: freescale: Discard pm_runtime_put() return value commit: 8bb108e4f6747dcea590710c4b6f95eebf4a04d6 [14/23] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Discard pm_runtime_put() return value commit: 455bf7d9256495e09fd3fd4a4e8a41e727f1043b [15/23] phy: core: Discard pm_runtime_put() return values commit: caad07ae07e3fb173e804abdd53fb96aa7186830 Best regards, -- ~Vinod