From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] cpufreq: imx: Use generic platdev driver Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:46:59 +0200 Message-ID: <18756925.NSB5aJaqC9@wuerfel> References: <08c7bf360dfb7620591c0e0de6e047fffb0a5546.1461228081.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:54442 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbcDUJrk (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 05:47:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <08c7bf360dfb7620591c0e0de6e047fffb0a5546.1461228081.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Viresh Kumar , Rafael Wysocki , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 21 April 2016 14:13:48 Viresh Kumar wrote: > The cpufreq-dt-platdev driver supports creation of cpufreq-dt platform > device now, reuse that and remove similar code from platform code. > > Cc: Shawn Guo > Cc: Sascha Hauer > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27-dt.c | 4 ---- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx51.c | 3 --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx53.c | 2 -- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx7d.c | 6 ------ > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 5 +++++ > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27-dt.c > index bd42d1bd10af..90c62bf01f9e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27-dt.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx27-dt.c > @@ -20,11 +20,7 @@ > > static void __init imx27_dt_init(void) > { > - struct platform_device_info devinfo = { .name = "cpufreq-dt", }; > - > of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL); > - > - platform_device_register_full(&devinfo); > } > Please remove the entire function now, a NULL .init_machine machine callback pointer has the same effect as the remaining line. The rest of the patch is fine. Arnd