From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] cpufreq: dt: disable unsupported OPPs Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 01:42:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1915959.KRxr8m7sM7@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1411738864-26549-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <3967829.hlAL1lU4Xl@vostro.rjw.lan> <1411979088.2625.1.camel@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:61663 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753102AbaI2XWf (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:22:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1411979088.2625.1.camel@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Lucas Stach Cc: Shawn Guo , Viresh Kumar , Mark Brown , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de On Monday, September 29, 2014 10:24:48 AM Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 26.09.2014, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > On Friday, September 26, 2014 03:40:59 PM Lucas Stach wrote: > > > If the regulator connected to the CPU voltage plane doesn't > > > support an OPP specified voltage with the acceptable tolerance > > > it's better to just disable the OPP instead of constantly > > > failing the voltage scaling later on. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach > > > > Why do you need this to be part of the whole series? Is there any > > hard dependency on it? > > > No there isn't any hard dependency. It's just that one of the boards I > was testing this series with needs this to properly disable one invalid > OPP. > > So it's no problem to rip this one out of the series. Sorry for the > confusion. OK Please resend it as a separate fix, then. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.