linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] PM: core: Add two macros for walking device links
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 15:45:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1944671.tdWV9SEqCh@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6202205.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add separate macros for walking links to suppliers and consumers of a
device to help device links users to avoid exposing the internals of
struct dev_links_info in their code and possible coding mistakes related
to that.

Accordingly, use the new macros to replace open-coded device links list
walks in the core power management code.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/base/base.h          |    8 ++++++++
 drivers/base/power/main.c    |   18 +++++++-----------
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c |    3 +--
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/base/base.h
+++ b/drivers/base/base.h
@@ -251,6 +251,14 @@
 void fw_devlink_drivers_done(void);
 void fw_devlink_probing_done(void);
 
+#define dev_for_each_link_to_supplier(__link, __dev)	\
+	list_for_each_entry_srcu(__link, &(__dev)->links.suppliers, c_node, \
+				 device_links_read_lock_held())
+
+#define dev_for_each_link_to_consumer(__link, __dev)	\
+	list_for_each_entry_srcu(__link, &(__dev)->links.consumers, s_node, \
+				 device_links_read_lock_held())
+
 /* device pm support */
 void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct device *dev);
 
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -40,10 +40,6 @@
 
 typedef int (*pm_callback_t)(struct device *);
 
-#define list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(pos, head, member) \
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu(pos, head, member, \
-			device_links_read_lock_held())
-
 /*
  * The entries in the dpm_list list are in a depth first order, simply
  * because children are guaranteed to be discovered after parents, and
@@ -281,7 +277,7 @@
 	 * callbacks freeing the link objects for the links in the list we're
 	 * walking.
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
+	dev_for_each_link_to_supplier(link, dev)
 		if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
 			dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
 
@@ -338,7 +334,7 @@
 	 * continue instead of trying to continue in parallel with its
 	 * unregistration).
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node)
+	dev_for_each_link_to_consumer(link, dev)
 		if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
 			dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
 
@@ -675,7 +671,7 @@
 	idx = device_links_read_lock();
 
 	/* Start processing the device's "async" consumers. */
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node)
+	dev_for_each_link_to_consumer(link, dev)
 		if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
 			dpm_async_with_cleanup(link->consumer, func);
 
@@ -1330,7 +1326,7 @@
 	idx = device_links_read_lock();
 
 	/* Start processing the device's "async" suppliers. */
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
+	dev_for_each_link_to_supplier(link, dev)
 		if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
 			dpm_async_with_cleanup(link->supplier, func);
 
@@ -1384,7 +1380,7 @@
 
 	idx = device_links_read_lock();
 
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
+	dev_for_each_link_to_supplier(link, dev)
 		link->supplier->power.must_resume = true;
 
 	device_links_read_unlock(idx);
@@ -1813,7 +1809,7 @@
 
 	idx = device_links_read_lock();
 
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node) {
+	dev_for_each_link_to_supplier(link, dev) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&link->supplier->power.lock);
 		link->supplier->power.direct_complete = false;
 		spin_unlock_irq(&link->supplier->power.lock);
@@ -2065,7 +2061,7 @@
 
 	idx = device_links_read_lock();
 
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node) {
+	dev_for_each_link_to_supplier(link, dev) {
 		if (!device_link_test(link, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME))
 			continue;
 
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -1903,8 +1903,7 @@
 
 	idx = device_links_read_lock();
 
-	list_for_each_entry_srcu(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node,
-				 device_links_read_lock_held())
+	dev_for_each_link_to_supplier(link, dev)
 		if (device_link_test(link, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
 			link->supplier_preactivated = true;
 			pm_runtime_get_sync(link->supplier);




  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-02 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02 13:40 [PATCH v1 0/2] PM: core: Updates related to device link lists Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-02 13:43 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] PM: core: Annotate loops walking device links as _srcu Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-04  9:23   ` Ulf Hansson
2025-09-02 13:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-09-04  9:23   ` [PATCH v1 2/2] PM: core: Add two macros for walking device links Ulf Hansson
2025-09-06 12:01 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] PM: core: Updates related to device link lists Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1944671.tdWV9SEqCh@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).