From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify the cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry()
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:22:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1966438.kvLUD13Eaz@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
That macro uses an internal static inline function that is first
totally unnecessary and second hard to read, so simplify it and
get rid of that monster.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -534,16 +534,6 @@ static inline void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufr
}
#endif
-static inline bool cpufreq_next_valid(struct cpufreq_frequency_table **pos)
-{
- while ((*pos)->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END)
- if ((*pos)->frequency != CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)
- return true;
- else
- (*pos)++;
- return false;
-}
-
/*
* cpufreq_for_each_entry - iterate over a cpufreq_frequency_table
* @pos: the cpufreq_frequency_table * to use as a loop cursor.
@@ -560,8 +550,11 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_next_valid(st
* @table: the cpufreq_frequency_table * to iterate over.
*/
-#define cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) \
- for (pos = table; cpufreq_next_valid(&pos); pos++)
+#define cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) \
+ for (pos = table; pos->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; pos++) \
+ if (pos->frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) \
+ continue; \
+ else
int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-25 23:22 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-02-26 2:32 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Simplify the cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry() Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1966438.kvLUD13Eaz@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox