From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 5/6] cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 01:27:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1969774.NfEI2hyvTT@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <5802c619494ba09e5c7621722e5a0778519c6a98.1433767914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:63268 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753520AbbFHXBf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 19:01:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5802c619494ba09e5c7621722e5a0778519c6a98.1433767914.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org, Srivatsa Bhat On Monday, June 08, 2015 06:25:31 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On cpu hot-unplug, we don't need to wait for POST_DEAD notification to > restart the governor if the policy has atleast one online cpu left. We > can restart the governor right from the DOWN_PREPARE notification > instead. Any explanation why this is correct here? -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.