Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com>
Subject: Re: cpufreq: frequency scaling spec in DT node
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:25:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19d1613b-aea0-1ddf-e5b4-11e027402de1@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170712100942.GF1679@vireshk-i7>

On 12/07/2017 12:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-07-17, 11:58, Mason wrote:
>> I would object to the characterization of "just a PLL" :-)
>>
>> The PLL outputs "garbage" before actually "locking" a target
>> frequency. It is not possible for the CPU to blindly change
>> the PLL settings, because that crashes the system.
>>
>> The bootloader implements the steps required to change said
>> settings, so the strategy has been: have Linux use whatever
>> PLL frequency the bootloader programs.
>>
>> Behind the PLL, there is a glitch-free divider, which is able
>> to divide the PLL output without crashing the system. I've
>> been using that divider for DFS.
>>
>> drivers/clk/clk-tango4.c
> 
> Okay, got it now.
> 
> Yes, you *really* need to create these OPPs dynamically.
> I am convinced now :)

I will test your patch on my 4.9 branch.

Does tango-cpufreq.c look acceptable to you?
(I am aware the patch needs work in the the Kconfig/Makefile part.
That was quick and dirty.)

Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-12 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-29  9:48 cpufreq: frequency scaling spec in DT node Mason
2017-06-29 10:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 11:41   ` Mason
2017-06-29 13:01     ` Mason
2017-06-29 14:35       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-29 14:34     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-11  9:27       ` Mason
2017-07-11 10:25         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-11 11:09           ` Mason
2017-07-11 11:56             ` Mason
2017-07-12  3:41             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12  9:58               ` Mason
2017-07-12 10:09                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-12 11:25                   ` Mason [this message]
2017-07-12 14:08                     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-07-11 13:36         ` Mason
2017-07-12  3:56           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19d1613b-aea0-1ddf-e5b4-11e027402de1@free.fr \
    --to=slash.tmp@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox