From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vegard Nossum" Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc5 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:37:44 +0200 Message-ID: <19f34abd0806112237l34653a96qdbcdaf829f90cf1d@mail.gmail.com> References: <19f34abd0806112231m69bd521fgbce3c5f8dd413423@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0806112231m69bd521fgbce3c5f8dd413423@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Power Management List , Lin Ming , "Rafael J. Wysocki" List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Vegard Nossum wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Len Brown wrote: >> please pull from: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release >> >> This will update the files shown below. > > What about the "ACPICA: Fixes for Unload and DDBHandles" patch? > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10669 > Hm, sorry, I only looked for the patch title in your series. It seems to be this entry: commit 8410565f540db87ca938f56f92780d251e4f157d Author: Bob Moore Date: Tue Jun 10 14:29:26 2008 +0800 ACPICA: Fix for access to deleted object Fixes problem introduced in 20080123, with fix for Unload operator. Parse tree object can be already deleted; must use the opcode within the WalkState. ACPI: kmemcheck: Caught 16-bit read from freed memory http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10669 Signed-off-by: Lin Ming Signed-off-by: Bob Moore Signed-off-by: Len Brown but now it has a completely new title and a new author? This looks like just the fix, I couldn't find the original patch (which had a nice title and description on its own). Hm. Thanks, and sorry for the noise. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036