From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH V2 Resend 54/92] cpufreq: longhaul: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:28:48 +0530 Message-ID: <1b8e40d118c01c38aa6e9573d371cdffed23581c.1380783079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:65499 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754745Ab3JCPFU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:05:20 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z10so2592453pdj.3 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:05:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c index 57d7b02..14df497 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c @@ -913,7 +913,6 @@ static int longhaul_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) longhaul_setup_voltagescaling(); policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 200000; /* nsec */ - policy->cur = calc_speed(longhaul_get_cpu_mult()); return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, longhaul_table); } -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e