From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A96264614 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 11:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747828626; cv=none; b=sh37s9oLObv3TkNoMkIsde0mNSr4XR5fpwD/cQZfSnzYKdqDbwTArXHKmuPmTXzHLaVZWHhQZgZ+76zg1rhc5exs5oVtBuWLbgqQhR2Cfki61cuI2R4NMWa+KZC8FdJBZ2ch2NdCly3t/WXnrlHnCK7w/fUvAGDDx+SKSxzJZH4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747828626; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FTQjxJ4lVkXXHckjRtChgAJuCCiAmABzoY+H+2UALeY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Eor4cXWcOH6mtcRuTlSI94tY8IA13+Nfg4/ObqItbLvKDsAMUr74M/xqGHpWfeN19gN40Yshs9OqCTRFRlL4j125RcyRInV9jOtU46I0G/IQcqKfWdEt687lcEdjib5VNVQ3mCGYZd4XmRXLX2lv4KqBzY6XbH/3RbBSbxFFMVQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB58D1515; Wed, 21 May 2025 04:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.64.80] (unknown [10.57.64.80]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 354D23F5A1; Wed, 21 May 2025 04:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1e7cb553-be71-4403-bc25-64457ec3e3d4@arm.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:57:00 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: rockchip: Relax SMCCC dependency To: Ulf Hansson , Heiko Stuebner Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <6f0a38e596c0727d0de13a29c9224f71bc7d30f1.1747760015.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> <2393836.usQuhbGJ8B@phil> From: Robin Murphy Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2025-05-21 12:41 pm, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 20:38, Heiko Stuebner wrote: >> >> Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2025, 19:10:17 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Robin Murphy: >>> Most 32-bit Rockchip platforms do not use PSCI, so having to select >>> ARM_PSCI to satisfy a dependency chain to retain working power domain >>> support is a bit weird and non-obvious. Now that the offending SMCCC API >>> is properly stubbed out for optional usage, we can relax this again. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner >> >> Of course this needs patch1 of this series to get applied >> first. >> >> I think for bisectability, doing this directly in patch1 might >> be less dangerous though? >> > > If it helps, I can pick both patches via my pmdomain tree, to make > sure patch1 really gets applied prior to patch2. Perhaps I should have been less lazy and written a brief cover letter, but indeed, given the dependency my hope was for these to both go together through the same tree - it's just an open question of which tree that should be :) Cheers, Robin. > Mark, Sudeep, Lorenzo do you see any problems with this? > > [...] > > Kind regards > Uffe