From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jordan Crouse" Subject: Re: Ottawa Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:08:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20050311170827.07daf488@cosmic.amd.com> References: <1110542934.5810.94.camel@gaston> <1110585295.5752.126.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============84000782693024867==" In-Reply-To: <1110585295.5752.126.camel@gaston> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org To: linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============84000782693024867== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:54:55 +1100 "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" wrote: > > On that note, no matter where we have it, I'd like to limit it to > > 6-8 people, with at most maybe 10. I don't wish to exclude anyone, > > but I think that smaller groups can remain more focused. Plus, > > there's all those sociological studies that say 6-7 people is the > > optimal size for a discussion group. :) > > Us, Nigel, David Brownell, Alan, Pavel, Brown, we are already 7... ? Are there any logical divisions of area of interest that could result in multiple productive meetings? Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Senior Linux Engineer AMD - Personal Connectivity Solutions Group --===============84000782693024867== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm --===============84000782693024867==--