From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Ottawa Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:13:20 -0800 Message-ID: <20050319061320.GA22127@kroah.com> References: <1110542934.5810.94.camel@gaston> <1110585295.5752.126.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============30370248303833947==" In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org To: Patrick Mochel Cc: Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============30370248303833947== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:16:50PM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > Sorry about the delay. Long week.. :/ > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > On that note, no matter where we have it, I'd like to limit it to 6-8 > > > people, with at most maybe 10. I don't wish to exclude anyone, but I think > > > that smaller groups can remain more focused. Plus, there's all those > > > sociological studies that say 6-7 people is the optimal size for a > > > discussion group. :) > > > > Us, Nigel, David Brownell, Alan, Pavel, Brown, we are already 7... ? > > Plus Adam Belay, maybe Greg K-H as the voice of reason, and maybe 1 more > that may arise before then, which would put us at 10. I'll try to make it, but will try to stay out of the conversation and let you all fight it out... :) greg k-h --===============30370248303833947== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============30370248303833947==--