From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: Nested suspends; messages vs. states Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:02:26 -0800 Message-ID: <200503231102.27137.david-b@pacbell.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============061143686739449699==" In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org To: linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============061143686739449699== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 22 March 2005 5:17 pm, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > We just need a > simple mechanism for parents to monitor the power state of their children. > Can't be that hard to come up with something clean. Minimally they can walk the list of their children at appropriate moments. I think folk have also raised the notion of having a "child state changed" call to the parent; it's not clear to me that needs to involve the PM core. - Dave --===============061143686739449699== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============061143686739449699==--