From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: freeze_processes questions
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:37:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050405203753.GC1380@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504052002.30245.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1922 bytes --]
Hi!
> > > > I have two questions regarding freeze_processes():
> > > >
> > > > 1) Shouldn't we take the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state into consideration? Now
> > > > we will fail if a process is sleeping when we try to freeze it.
> > >
> > > We can't allow processes to sleep at arbitrary places. Therefore we
> > > send UNINTERRUPTIBLE task a signal, and hope it can get into
> > > refrigerator in time.
> >
> > Hm, AFAIK we can't kill an UNINTERRUPTIBLE process, can we? Which means that
> > we can't deliver a signal to it too ...
>
> Well, the problem is that signal_wake_up() is not sufficient to make
> an uninterruptible task get the signal. It only sets TIF_SIGPENDING for the
> task, which is not quite good, IMHO (when the task finally wakes up,
> it gets the "signal" and enters refrigerator(), because it has PF_FREEZE set,
> and stays there forever, as there's nothing that could clear PF_FROZEN for
> it).
Do you see any problem with UNINTERRUPTIBLE processess? THey should
not stay in UNINTERRUPTIBLE state for too long.. If they get back into
something normal within timeout, we freeze them just okay.
> I think it may be fixed in one of the two ways:
>
> 1) We can treat uninterruptible tasks as non-freezable (in analogy to stopped
> tasks) - if all of the other tasks are frozen, nothing can wake up an uninterruptible
> task, so this seems to be a safe approach.
HW event can wake that task up.
> 2) We can try to force uninterruptible tasks to get their "signals" anyway using
> wake_up_state() directly on them (which I don't like as much).
They are probably uninterruptible for a reason...
If something is staying in UNINTERRUPTIBLE for more than 1 second, it
is going to cause problems elsewhere, anyway. Do you see that happening?
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 9:20 freeze_processes questions Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 9:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-05 9:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 18:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 18:17 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-05 18:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 20:37 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-04-05 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 22:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-05 23:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-06 6:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-06 19:06 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-06 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-06 21:03 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-06 21:26 ` David Brownell
2005-04-06 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-06 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-06 22:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-06 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 14:41 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 14:43 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 17:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 9:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-07 12:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 12:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-07 14:36 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 18:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 20:00 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 22:09 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-08 6:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 9:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-08 6:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-11 23:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-27 9:30 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-27 9:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 4:48 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-28 5:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 5:21 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-28 5:49 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 6:01 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-28 6:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 8:15 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-28 8:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-28 15:19 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-28 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 7:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-06 21:34 ` David Brownell
2005-04-06 22:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-06 22:20 ` David Brownell
2005-04-07 9:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 6:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 7:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050405203753.GC1380@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox