From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Subject: Re: Re: freeze_processes questions
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:20:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050408062010.GA1381@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504072259.56759.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1499 bytes --]
Hi!
> > > It seems that if a process calls wait_for_completion() right before suspend,
> > > the other task supposed to complete its completion may be accidentally frozen
> > > before it's able to do this. It looks like this happens to kseroid sometimes
> > > on suspend-during-resume.
> >
> > You mean, when a suspend occurs so soon after a resume that the resume has
> > fully completed yet?
>
> No.
>
> During resume, we boot the kernel, check if there's an image to read and
> (if there's one) we freeze processes using the refrigerator (we need to get rid
> of them so that we can restore the image safely). Then, it seems, on
> some systems, freeze_processes() may be called before all of the compiled-in
> drivers complete their initialization. In particular, kseriod calls usermodehelper
> at that time, which makes it wait uninterruptibly for a helper process to
> complete. If that helper process is frozen, we end up with the uninterruptible
> kseriod that we can't freeze and _resume_ fails, which is not nice, especially
> that we don't need to care for this kseriod, as we are going to restore
> the image in a while ...
>
> Perhaps we should not use the refrigerator during resume, or we could use a
> slightly modified version? I don't know.
As we allow resume to be called from userland, other refrigerator is
not really an option. We could insert mdelay before resume, or some
equivalent trick...
Pavel
--
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-08 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 9:20 freeze_processes questions Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 9:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-05 9:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 18:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 18:17 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-05 18:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-05 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-05 22:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-05 23:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-06 6:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-06 19:06 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-06 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-06 21:03 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-06 21:26 ` David Brownell
2005-04-06 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-06 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-06 22:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-06 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 14:41 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 14:43 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 17:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 9:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-07 12:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 12:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-07 14:36 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 18:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 20:00 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-07 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 22:09 ` Alan Stern
2005-04-08 6:20 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-04-08 9:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-07 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-08 6:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-11 23:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-27 9:30 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-27 9:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 4:48 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-28 5:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 5:21 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-28 5:49 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 6:01 ` Li Shaohua
2005-04-28 6:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-28 8:15 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-28 8:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-28 15:19 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-28 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 7:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-06 21:34 ` David Brownell
2005-04-06 22:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-04-06 22:20 ` David Brownell
2005-04-07 9:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 6:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-08 7:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050408062010.GA1381@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox