From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Belay Subject: Re: [RFC] Power Management API (rev 1) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 03:23:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20050423072358.GD27771@neo.rr.com> References: <1113773748.3451.142.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050420155956.GA3372@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============13109530667552916==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050420155956.GA3372@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Adam Belay , Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============13109530667552916== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:59:56PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: -->snip > > We already have int system_state... How is this different? > -->snip > > Having "unsigned int state" is asking for trouble. > -->snip > > Are they same type as system_power_state.state? This should be clear, > and type-checked by sparse. Otherwise people will get it wrong. > > Hi Pavel, I appreciate the suggestions. I'm currently making some revisions. I'll clarify things further once they're ready. Thanks, Adam --===============13109530667552916== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============13109530667552916==--