From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Re: freeze_processes questions Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:14:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20050428081435.GE1906@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1114595634.7918.25.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au> <1114663706.22110.35.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============31585419804741077==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1114663706.22110.35.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Li Shaohua Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , Nigel Cunningham List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============31585419804741077== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! > > That's right, but the example you give below is userspace (syslogd) vs > > kernel space (kjournald), so I wonder if something could be wrong with > > your implementation. > Right, my example can be solved with your patch. But I'd like a more > generic solution to solve all the dependences, like user space tasks > dependencies. How can usespace processes depend on each other? By definition user task sleeps in place where it holds no locks... it can't block anyone. Pavel -- Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java. --===============31585419804741077== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============31585419804741077==--