Re: [RFC] Linux Power Management

[Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1144 bytes --]

Hi!

> > If they use GPIO lines on chip that eats so much power that it must be
> > power-managed... yes, I'd call that broken hardware.
> 
> By virtue of being in the driver model, it _is_ managed no
> matter how much power it uses (or doesn't use).  The issue
> isn't how much power it uses.  It's the expectation that all
> power signals only flow parallel to data and control busses,
> as they would on daughtercard based designs.
> 
> I'd tend to agree with hardware guys on this one:  this is
> such a simple case that only broken _software_ should have
> trouble handling it.
> 
> 
> > Of course, current pm core *is* inadequate for even simple uses...
> 
> Right, and GPIO based power switching is a "simple use".
> Luckily the init sequence tweaks I described make Linux
> work with it, until selective suspend kicks in.

Well, GPIO power switching should be very easy to handle ... as long
as path between CPU and GPIO-based-power-switches takes little
power. When we don't have to power-manage the path between CPU and
GPIO-based-power-switches, we are fine...
								Pavel
-- 
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]