From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: A reference implementation of PCI suspend/resume?
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 17:26:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505161726.42479.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050516151937.63b37fbb@cosmic.amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1239 bytes --]
On Monday 16 May 2005 2:19 pm, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2005 16:16:06 -0400
> "Adam Belay" <ambx1@neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > b.) You're assuming every device has its own interrupt. This may not
> > be the case. Let's say one device was sharing interrupts with a few
> > other devices...
>
> I ran into this very problem a while back on 2.4. On my platform, the
> EHCI and OCHI host controllers share an interrupt. ...
>
> Now, granted that particular scenario is a corner case, and the PCI
> hardware should have been configured better, but it shows that you
> can't assume that any given interrupt handler will only be called with
> active hardware underneath.
Very true, and that's part of why drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c frees
IRQs during suspend, and reclaims them later.
AFAICT that code is the most generic PCI suspend/resume code now
available ... since it's got to work with dozens of different
implementations of EHCI, OHCI, and UHCI; with widely varying
BIOS versions and bugs; and where not all controllers support
the PCI PM extensions.
Note the wierdnesses there ... cases where the PCI API calls are
wierdly asymmetric, and where "swsusp" can really bork things
by entering bizarre "resume" paths.
- Dave
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-17 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-14 5:06 A reference implementation of PCI suspend/resume? Fabrice Gautier
2005-05-16 4:53 ` David Brownell
2005-05-16 8:55 ` Shaohua Li
2005-05-16 20:16 ` Adam Belay
2005-05-16 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-05-16 21:19 ` Jordan Crouse
2005-05-17 0:26 ` David Brownell [this message]
2005-05-17 9:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-05-17 18:35 ` David Brownell
2005-05-17 19:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-05-18 1:26 ` Adam Belay
2005-05-18 17:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-05-18 18:32 ` Alan Stern
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-16 19:02 Fabrice Gautier
2005-05-16 19:39 ` David Brownell
2005-05-12 1:24 Shaohua Li
2005-05-12 6:21 ` Adam Belay
2005-05-12 7:03 ` Shaohua Li
2005-05-27 6:49 ` Shaohua Li
2005-05-27 7:20 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200505161726.42479.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox